My philosophical ideas 2 Follow story

antonio Antonio Pinto Renedo

This book represents a journey through the world through meditation.

Inspirational All public.

#meditation #philosophy
reading time
AA Share



Antonio Pinto Renedo


© Author, layout and cover design:

Antonio Pinto Renedo


Published in April 2016




Chapter-1 MEDICINE

Tips flu

Tips against migraines


Order and hobby


Chapter-2 SCIENCE

Genuine art

The Flood

The new Year

The order in the couple

Bipolarity of the cosmos

Total justice and exceptions

The pyramid of knowledge

The rigidity of the universe

Circles of evolution


Chapter-3 POLICY

Freedom of opinion

Germany's dilemma

Religion and race

Islamist extremism

The inertia of the masses

Military inertia

Citizens' parties


Law and Justice

Decent politicians

Asymmetric society


The last war



The devil does not exist

The false god

The true concept of God

The new idols

The essence of happiness

False philosophy

The loneliness of a philosopher

Vanity of sects


Poverty and dignity

Personality of Jesus

A new Christianity

The doubt

The inner sun

The final contact




This book represents the second part of the articles shown in my blog (The way to the new era) once a certain amount of them is assembled, I transform them into PDF and upload them to the internet so they can be downloaded for free. The truth is that the purpose of life is to obtain happiness and not obtain money, because money can help but not guarantee it. The main objective of these publications is to promote the free dissemination of ideas and encourage readers to think freely, without submitting to the topics of each era.

This book has been translated from the original version in Spanish.


Chapter-1 MEDICINE




Few people know that in fact the flu does not need any medication to cure, it is the immune system itself that heals us, however it is true that the difference between healing is quick and easy or is slow and difficult it may depend on the way we treat it. Here I propose some tips that I see it useful. First a measure that I consider advisable not to spend the duration of the illness in bed, because even bother not why we canceled as people, the horizontal position may favor the onset of fever and headache with increasing pressure blood in the brain, also causes an imbalance in sleep rhythms making it more difficult to sleep at night, right is being horizontally alone at night. It is also useful to combat the disease avoid possible cough, infection usually attacks among other body parts throat, but the more you cough more irritated and cough worsens, is only useful cough when phlegm formed in the coughing and breathing tube is then suitable means expel, it is also recommended nose blowing gently to avoid breakage of fine blood vessels that are found in it. Another useful measure is to avoid excessive temperatures in homes as it contributes to increasing fever and also dries the airways; it is also helpful to avoid excessive shelter, especially in the afternoon that is when the fever rises. Another useful measure is to avoid over-medication, because as I said is the immune system itself that heals us, why rush into taking medications can be a hindrance rather than a solution, fever in mild form can be useful, as it increases body temperature causing blood this more fluid, besides inflammation often associated increases the diameter of the veins allowing the arrival of more blood to the infected area and therefore more antibodies, the better fighting infection, so it is advisable anti-inflammatory use only in case of high fever. It is also useful to do some form of exercise during illness, as this apart from strengthening our body stimulates blood circulation. One of the symptoms that may indicate the onset of flu is the sense of smell of burning caused by virus activity in the olfactory glands or changes in the way we perceive the flavors.




Actually many headaches begin in the form of allergies, so it is necessary to be informed whether you are experiencing one with the aim of preventing allergies to pollen or dust are well known but one that may go unnoticed is allergy moisture, this allergy begins with inhalation of steam, this steam burn the skin overlying the sinuses causing a small infection, in order to promote blood flow and eliminate the infection, the body causes an increase in the size the veins that connect the nose to the brain resulting in fever and headache, for this reason it is advisable to avoid possible inhalation of the vapors. Nasal symptoms of this infection can be confused with cutting digestion, because the dilated veins in the brain compresses other vessels may cause loss of vision, memory or feeling of paralysis of the left side of the face.




It is a misconception that children are people without importance because it is in that part of their life where they acquire a personality, even in the stage of babies is important not to forget about them and actively participate in their education, parents should provide their legs catching them children in their arms to show things as though they cannot walk their vision and memory capacity are widely developed, it is also important that children will receive the love of their parents.

The good thing about children is that when they are young have not yet acquired the prejudices that are common in an adult, because there have been prejudices at all times, sometimes result from ignorance, and other manipulation of the facts so interested, the problem is that real few prejudices are sometimes considered as such at the time in which they have and only later recognized, so it is important to analyze things objectively trying to avoid drawing hasty conclusions, i.e. what today it is considered an adult personality is the result of assimilating many wrong but practically forced acceptance by the mass social beliefs.

Adults should learn from children the joy of living, because regardless of how old you are, every day is a new opportunity to be happy, as our body allows us must do whatever we want within our means.

It should also take into account the views of children, because although they have less knowledge than adults does not stop having feelings or they can be right sometimes, for no one for many knowledge you have can know everything besides talking to them and listen to their views is positive in its development.

A child is a person not a cabinet and when it is small has a great desire to learn, but it's as if you were at the bottom of a dark pit in which only light at the end is why adults should help them directed towards the light, giving them the knowledge they lack to be adults.




In everyday life activities would be appropriate to establish an order to things done more effectively, the order consists of performing the tasks in an hour or so preset is not only a tool to facilitate the smooth running of tasks but which is also good for health as a continuous change of customs hampers farsighted ability of our body, a good practice would be for example sleep eight hours a day and these hours of wakefulness and sleep were the same and the same times as much weekdays and holidays, another positive measure would not interject holidays in the middle of working days, this would lengthen life and improve health. It is also true that abuse the development of customs can be counterproductive, it is what is called compulsive or hobby activity, this behavior can have two main causes, one is caused by a deterioration of health, and the other occurs as result of nerve pressure and stress, i.e. when a methodical and organized person by nature is subjected to great pressure, tends unconsciously to exaggerate customs in order to leave more free mind and increase its capacity concentration before the possible occurrence of these unforeseen problems that cause stress. While it is true that excess in the planned customs is inadequate, it is also true that perform daily activities in an orderly manner reduces errors, increases concentration on tasks, and can increase the available memory capacity, being automatic, provided many of the usual processes.


Chapter-2 SCIENCE




Today we see anything called art, it seems that people have lost the ability to distinguish the beautiful from what is not, are not able to understand that true art it is the result of effort and sacrifice and not the trivial whims, because art arises when something is created in harmony with nature, something that has a logic and a result, because there is much more art in the design of an engine or the architecture of a building, which those vulgar drawings what they call abstract art, people are not able to understand that those who call themselves artists are but a redoubt of vague and pretentious that generally lack talent, because before any criticism they simply say You do not understand my art! It's that you are ignorant! but would have to see if those artists call themselves are able to do something that requires talent as an old portrait or engineering design, sure to fail, because it is easier to give a few strokes on a canvas and then call it art, do something that requires difficulty and is not that it can make sense to abstract art, but when it is not based on absurd drawings, because its true meaning is to use recognizable symbolic figures but in situations other than its normal form, i.e. be able to suggest something more important and logical to observe it, but that requires talent and know how to draw something that impostors would find it impossible to get, but the worst part is that this present society, which is believed so developed, something as basic as this will be difficult to understand. We live in a society without order or moral society whose God is the only commodity production, so it is logical that this band is capable of developing impostors. It is regrettable that when those individuals who call themselves artists of the abstract are promoted by an art gallery, become treated as being deified and their absurd drawings are seeking twisted justifications and cultural value undeserving and everything in order promote the gallery and get money, citizens should not easily accept the arguments of those false artists, because in this present degenerate society all are selfish interests and needs an objective analysis to arrive at the truth and not be easily carried away by the means or beliefs of the masses can be manipulated easily. Only in a society without order or moral existence of such impostors it explained, because when a world lacks direction is very difficult to produce true artists, therefore it tends to elevate those undesirable and fiction is created that their works are just great because they want to look in the mirror and understand the decadent world in which they live.




The legend of the Great Flood is present in many cultures, this belief may have its origin in the events that occurred after the end of the last glaciation occurred about twelve thousand years ago, at that time much of the earth's surface was covered by ice, this caused the level of the seas off dozens of lower meters at present, at that time the main centers of civilization were located in today's desert areas but in those days had extensive vegetation, mainly in the regions of Egypt and Mesopotamia. The beginning of the thaw caused a growing flood in the river beds and an elevation in the level of the coast, this in the mouths of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers it must have caused major flooding. Climate change not only occurred in that region, because everyone was affected, the Channel had a layer of ice that connected France with England, when thawing this penetrated the sea and definitely separated. Many large islands were reduced to insignificant islets. But where it could be the most dramatic change is in the Mediterranean area, because the increased sea level this penetrated from the Atlantic through the Strait of Gibraltar flooding throughout the region. Increasing the Earth's temperature turned what was once a green oasis in a desert region like the Sahara in Egypt and Mesopotamia, gradually changing the sphere of political power in Africa and the Middle East to Europe. Probably the events in ancient times as a result of the end of glaciation were passed in the ancient stories like a great flood, the mistakenly believed it was caused by rain and not by the melting of large amounts of water.




Since ancient times all civilizations tried to measure time and it realized the usefulness of using the solstices, one in winter and one in summer to measure the seasons and over the years, so they began to make buildings as Stonehenge to determine the largest solar inclination and thus to fix at this time the beginning of the year, because there is only one winter or summer solstice each year.

It would therefore be desirable for the year again start with the winter solstice on Dec. 22, when starting in antiquity, because it makes sense as understood by the old the new year begins at the moment the sun begins to rise and the days are getting longer, this is the true way nature classifies years. It was actually the Catholic Church that envy of the festival traditionally celebrated at that time decided to set the birth of Jesus a few days later, on December 25, with malicious order to wrest this party its true meaning. Indeed the Catholic Church is completely unaware of the actual date of Jesus' birth or even the year, so its bad faith in this regard is clear, and there was this his only invention because in fact everything about the childhood of Jesus and subsequent stories about his miracles were invented such falsehoods should not attribute them to Jesus, for we must not forget that the Catholic church was not founded by him but by the Roman empire as a last resort to prevent its collapse. It would therefore be good for society to recover the winter solstice as the date for establishing the beginning of the year and thus getting back tune with nature, but also the institutions should review the history and unmask the falsehoods propagated by religious organizations because it cannot accept that the mere presumptions are proposed citizens as unquestionable truths.




In any organized system there needs to be clear leadership to make possible the order in marriage this is equally important, because both spouses are two people with two ways of thinking different, so in my opinion it is necessary to establish a control command by which man holds the office of president of meaning to the family.

This in no way be confused with a dictatorship because the man should only perform the function of commanding a democratic form without imposing his will, i.e. its leadership role should be only administrative taking into account the views of others and be fair and benevolent in its deliberations. Of course the right of withdrawal must always be recognized for both, because as I said the leadership of the husband in no case should be a dictatorship. It is also true that the fact that man holds the office of president of the family does not prevent it from having some obligations to them and therefore does not meet its commitments would be fair to reproach him for it. It is necessary that each spouse understand that each gender was made by nature to specialize in different functions therefore need not wonder that these functions are also different in marriage, but it is also true that such specialization does not have to prevent right of both spouses to be equally happy. For this reason the law also has to act accordingly and in case of separation recognize both spouses equal right to care for their children except that they can demonstrate a clear guilt of one, i.e. that both spouses they could live with their children the same time until they were older or share the common housing in equal time periods.

In order to obtain the vote for women in some countries politicians raised family relationships only as feminist topics, so they considered that in case of separation guilt is always the man, or in this case this would be unable to cope well their children, and be committed injustice to establish that virtually all the goods of marriage happen to women, i.e. the floor, children, and even an important part of the salary of her husband, this makes separation a lynching but with the backed by the law, forgetting their duty to be fair and impartial and condemning the man to misery, these types of laws rather than regulate the separation they do is induce her, clearly favoring one of the spouses, as part of course the man was rich and therefore able to dispose of their property without suffering any consequences.

The truth is that because of feminism many women are not ready for marriage, because since childhood has taught them that their duty is to confront men in the workplace instead of serving as mothers, so motherhood pose as a hindrance in carrying out such topics and in many cases only come to have a child which is totally insufficient for generational change, thus feminism becomes a real threat to bring society to its own self extermination. The pro political feminist posed by immigration as a solution, but that does not prevent the main problem is the lack of birth and is only a partial solution to transfer other problem, besides causing a real racial and cultural disorder in society, turning it into a semi-slave social group, by causing the massive influx of immigrants lowering of minimum wages. I do not mean by this that women cannot enter the labor market, the issue is that it would be logical to first fulfill their duty as mothers ensuring generational change and from there can be made in other fields.

But most surprising is to see how feminists intend to raise as illogical the fact that women are the ones that should be responsible primarily for the care of children especially in their childhood, because if we look at the example of the way the animals care for their offspring we can see that it is the females who usually deal with their offspring in a more direct way, yet in humans can be used adjectives like sexism or feminism but it would be stupid to apply such epithets to animals because these are much more conditioned by nature in their behavior that we, if anyone should be considered as sexist that accusation would have to fall on the nature or God and not on animals, but if the question to consider is who has more wisdom If feminists or nature inclined me for the second, for it is nature that decided through evolution separate the animals into sexes and it was nature that determined them to be women who will become pregnant and suckle their children, not men, because I think it was much better specialization in gender and separation of functions that it was derived and not to have one advantage over the other but for the good of all. So how wrong it is considered that the separation in different functions equals one underestimation of women, for this separation in no case have to consider that the right to an abuse of one sex over the other, since both have an obligation to respected and collaborate in the development of the family and both have the same right to be happy. At the end gives the impression that many of these feminist movements actually are led by unfeminine women but with great ambition for power, which is actually what they want is to use the rest of women screen so that it is not known what really want is to live a life of men, but not because it is good for women but because they do not feel women.




Arguably the cosmos most things have a positive or negative, which should not be confused with good or bad, as both are benign, this bipolarity is born with the nature of the cosmos, polar definition because essentially I start with the that the subject is the opposite of vacuum and vacuum is the opposite of the art, both are the same but in reverse, the field represents the existence and vacuum nonexistence both exist outside time, because there can be no one without the other, since the void matter could not be compared with anything, as the vacuum is nothing. As a result there arise from calls polarities arising for example the sexes or the magnetic poles, but is immense amount of things that are defined polar form. In the universe the two polarities are equally important, but that does not mean that it fulfilled the same functions, so lamentable is the current confrontation between the sexes, because it is not understood that the fact that both are equally necessary does not mean that they have to do the same things.


They are masculine values


The sun relative to the earth, salt, heat, red, the galactic core, circle, power, government, the crest in a sling, the pleasure derived from the technique, the magnetic pole positive for the leaving the particles on the vertical line, the minority, the numbers one, two, four, five, seven and eight.


They are feminine values


The planets from the sun, the stars about the galactic core, sugar, philosophy, cold, blue, square, night, the valley in a sling, the horizontal line, water, sea, the negative magnetic pole by entering particles, the majority, the numbers zero, three, six and nine.

There are actually male or female values in all, this is not a contradiction, the key is expressed in different planes.






It represents good light, white, justice, truth, intelligence, wisdom, knowledge, right, progress, above.




Evil represents ignorance, darkness, error, down the mistake, the black color. Do not confuse the positive and negative values present in the cosmos in most things good and evil, for positive or negative values are all benign and necessary while evil is defined in another way, it represents what is unacceptable and wrong. Good and evil have in common with the values that have polarity that are opposites like them, but unlike them it does not mean that both are desirable, because in fact evil only represents that which is never desirable and therefore something that we should stay away. Good then represents the right and acceptable, wrong and wrong and wrong, are opposite each other, but only one represents what makes sense to do. Actually evil could be defined as the percentage of accidents is inevitable in the evolution of the cosmos, for it has no sense to look for evil intended, therefore err who adhere to sects based on evil, it is as if identified with ignorance, stupidity or would delay those arising evil objective end up being unhappy, then lie in an unstable position who becomes antisocial and unable to relate to others in a balanced way. Evil is the result of the inevitable return of the cosmos to the ignorance that is derived from its restart, the universe just like people also have to die to be renewable, with this renewal comes forgetfulness and oblivion comes the error, but also the shock of the new, yet the suffering caused the error is not a goal in itself, but is a necessary evil if the universe wants to renew, why are mistaken who think that evil is desirable as good, for what the world needs is to start again and forget to be renewable, but evil is merely the suffering caused by the error, the result of this renewal, evil is not an objective in itself, what is needed is renewed the cosmos and again to be able to recycle ignorance, evil is undesirable consequence of this renewal and this whole effort is based progress in the fight to avoid the mistake that makes us suffer and Represent to evil, a constant struggle from darkness into light. Evil is the error, and obviously no one wants to be wrong, however renew the universe needs to be able to forget, and it is because of forgetfulness as ignorance, error and evil arises. Evil in human behavior stems from a mistaken view of reality, by those who so behave believe that a permanent attitude of confrontation with their peers they will serve, but such a thing is an error derived from being led by a petty and despotic approach to things, but that makes them unhappy who so behave, because it is wrong and unbalanced behavior, it is necessary to understand that in human relations good and peaceful coexistence must be the cornerstones of behavior in order to be happy. One of the possible explanations of evil in human behavior would be a deviation in the natural aggressiveness caused by excessive consent from parents, which would result in a petty behavior as a common pattern, so it is essential to teach moral values from the childhood.

The universe when it restarts again ignorance of the error drift and error derives evil, but that does not mean that evil is the goal of cosmic renewal but rather an inevitable consequence, therefore from the same time the cosmos begins to evolve the effort of every living creature is to progress from darkness to light and from ignorance to knowledge. Therefore the universe to renew and forget not looking for evil, but again reliving the same emotions as if for the first time. For this reason those worlds that reach a high level of evolution definitively banish evil represented by vanity and ignorance.




As I said these colors are benign and necessary essence, however they can also represent good or evil, but secondary, these colors can represent both masculine values such as female depending on the plane in which they are.


The white


White represents the horizontal line in planes but also the vertical in others, truth, goodness, justice, the day, progress, white light, sugar, intelligence, philosophy, above the divine , the backbone of the universe, universal laws, most in some planes represents the masculine and other feminine.


The black color


The black color represents the night, seriousness, in a deep valley, rest, renewal, minority, sometimes evil, error or ignorance in some planes represents the feminine but in other male.

It is clear then that the existence of positive and negative values in the cosmos are both equally necessary and benign and should not be confused with the evil of the error, and is only the result of the renewal of the cosmos, it is true that to give rise to this renewal is also provided that evil appears, but is not a goal in itself, but an inevitable consequence, renewed and re ignorance is necessary when the universe has aged, it allows live again emotions as if they were new, the suffering caused by the error and represents evil is just the price to pay for this renewal. For this reason all evolved society must have the right and justice as fundamental philosophical principles.




In principle any evolved society needs a code of moral values to establish justice as principal rule of conduct, otherwise it would be impossible to create a stable social order, in my opinion ideally defend the full justice as the only way to raise behavior moral, totaling justice means the fair and without exception as the only acceptable behavior, however it is also possible to believe in an approach to fair behavior admitting exceptions, this is the reason for writing this article, i.e. trying to make sense logical to define this as in the case of sense.

First let me say that admitted the possibility of considering unfair behaviors as valid only make sense if raised as exceptional, meaning that although it is rooted at the idea that both justice and injustice be necessary or justifiable to considered as part of a set of different polarities but equally important these forces actually be expressed in planes or different dimensions, i.e. that justice should be raised as the norm of behavior and injustice as the exception, in this sense right behavior should be the present regular moral way the human mind as both dimensions must always be separated, be ambiguous about it can only cause harm to those who confuse it, i.e. the pursuit of good and justice should be the main engine behavior and possible unfair behaviors appear only casually and indirectly. This means that even considering to justice and injustice as two equal and necessary forces in a generic sense not behave in practice, it would be distributed as if in them a force of gravity that would separate distributed in the form of majority is applied and minority, this does not mean underestimating the minority force, as a relative size is not the same as an absolute value, we can find in the cosmos examples to prove, such as the distribution of the solar system, in this case the sun represents the except it is in the center of the system and the different star of others, and planets represent the norm because they are more numerous, yet the sun still being only one and different is so important in organizing the solar system as planets it is larger and more massive than all the planets together and is the source of energy in the cosmos.

Another example is how the political system is distributed in an organized society, in this case government members represent the exception and all other citizens the norm, but the exception in this case is who runs the state but always in direct connection with society. This shows that the separation of the majority and minority dimensions need not be interpreted as an underestimation of the concept of minority. It could be said that the key would then be in the potential, meaning that although the right behavior should be the protagonist of our lives in terms of our habitual behavior, exceptional cases of injustice would have greater importance may be associated with often political or economic power, this does not mean that those in power have to be necessarily unfair, but the power it easy.

Arguably, from a symbolic point of view that injustice is like the sun, something energetic but exceptional and separate from the norm and stability represented by justice and planets, therefore who plays what can burn and need to clearly separate both things and therefore do not play with this issue and uphold justice as the norm of our usual moral conduct, and that basically every action has a consequence and who questions the rights of others risk the reaction represents self-defense.

In this case the sun is expressed in a vertical and minority and symbolized by the red plane, could also represent injustice or central government, the planets in this case the horizontal line represent good and white. We must differentiate in this case the injustice of tyranny; injustice would be represented by red, from this point of view I have sometimes felt exceptionally. Tyranny would be represented by the black color and would be rejected always, it is a variant of injustice but out of place and sense and posed as a form of habitual behavior, i.e. that evil would be injustice but when it abandons its balanced attitude and moderate to become tyranny, could be defined as a disease of the spirit when it loses track of reality and therefore is a wrong and always reprehensible conduct, it is necessary to say that the black color in this case has a negative meaning but this It needs not necessarily be the case because the colors are essentially benign and malignant approach depends on the circumstances, since deep evil and tyranny are the result of ignorance and this is precisely one of the meanings of the color black , i.e. it is the inability to see the white light of truth and knowledge.

Although the wrongful conduct might make sense at times, this would have to be very clear and never look regularly appear as always exceptional and would not be the dominant element in our mind. Precisely what is defined as demon is when someone ignores this and becomes evil in its raison for being, this alone can hurt him, because he becomes incapable antisocial relate to anyone except those degenerate like him, it is therefore necessary to teach moral behavior from children to understand the consequences of antisocial behavior a can have.

Another way to explain why justice should be the moral principle of conduct is that from an energy standpoint justice represents, while serious injustice vertical line energetically unstable, horizontal and stable line for this reason it healthy and safe life is to consider taking justice as a way of normal behavior. As I said definitions of vertical and horizontal planes are not fixed and in other circumstances justice is expressed vertically as the backbone of the universe, and representing the divine, the truth and the white light. As I said the fact define evil black or injustice red does not mean that therefore these colors should be considered negative, as these interpretations are only one of the secondary variants that may be associated these colors, since all colors are benign essentially the same can be said with respect to numbers.

So it could be said that although justice and injustice were considered as two acceptable forces in generic terms, the perfect balance in human behavior only find separating these concepts into one majority and a minority, being therefore just conduct the normal way of our being and just having this clear our minds can find your balance.

To explain more clearly the theory of the exceptions of justice would arguably be a square scheme X in which the lines would go from top left to bottom right and from top right to bottom left, on the right triangle and white justice would be found and the left and red triangle injustice would be found, this would represent the absolute generic values, but in practice justice occupy most of the horizontal surface and injustice minimal but with more height because They are expressed in the form of majority and minority, arguably is as two schemes, one square with an X in the center, are expressed only the absolute values, in the other rectangular, or also oval as the shape of a galaxy the way in which it is normally expressed as percentages does so by majority and minority shown. However when we refer to the ratio between good and bad it would be the same approach but in this case the scheme would be rotated reaching the wrong black on the bottom and the fine white on top, in this case is different because unlike evil injustice would always be rejected without exception, being a wrong behavior. Therefore in the case of logic considering exceptions theory of justice this should be raised as the usual moral norm, the possible exceptions would instinctively and evil as we have always said it would be rejected.

It can be said then that although the right and wrong have equal absolute values in practice be distributed in completely different and separate planes defined in this case injustice in a vertical plane and justice in a horizontal plane, but depend on the circumstances as the case may occur in reverse, because if we change the dimensional plane and turn the above scheme placing injustice as horizontal element and justice as vertical element passed to the plane of good and evil, in this case the fine would be located above symbolizing white light and progress, and evil would be located below representing the black color and ignorance. In this case the evil would always be objectionable because it represents the suffering caused by the error, however the universe needs to continuously recycled and one consequence of this is again ignorance is not ignorance and suffering caused by it they are a goal in itself but rather an unavoidable evil.

It is clear therefore that although exceptions were deemed acceptable in justice, however long would objectionable petty and despotic behavior, true expression of evil, because these behaviors are always harmful to those who use them, for evil it represents the deviation justice with exceptions to the vanity and tyranny, leaving the moderate attitude is always a mistake, so it is always reprehensible without exception. The true meaning of the phrase, selling his soul to the devil, is that when someone comes to a miserly attitude thinking about profit ends up losing more than winning, because evil is in itself a wrong action because it represents the abandonment by the spirit of the necessary attitude of moderation that is necessary for life, people who act like they never feel happy about many things that have, because happiness does not depend solely on the goods, but the attitude one have towards life. Therefore, in the case considered certain exceptions theory of justice would be best to teach children philosophy of justice as fundamental without more, because trying to explain the exceptions too soon could lead to unnecessary errors. This means that in the evolved worlds there could be cases of injustice such as those related to the advantages of power or the remuneration of salaries, but the petty behaviors such as tyranny, vanity or despotism, which are the true expressions, would disappear altogether of evil.

The good is light, and light is knowledge and progress, it is therefore necessary that the meaning of life is always to good, although sometimes could be considered justified inequitable conduct, because evil and injustice not are exactly the same, evil is not something that the universe needs, it is rather the price you have to pay for recycled and returned to ignorance, because it is derived from it, but ignorance is the result of regenerating and reliving universal life again.

In this case we have analyzed how would a philosophy of moral attitude considered justified admit exceptions just conduct necessary for coexistence, however since it is true that most life issues exceptions are considered logical, of according to this rule could also be considered logical to admit in this case an exception and consider that justice must be total and if exceptions could not be considered as a contradiction to the necessary search of moderate balance and intermediate usually is the most right, because in this case the unjust acts would be considered always wrong and therefore always objectionable and therefore outside the rules of the exceptional use of things in the universe all things are possible have to be acceptable, even as an exception, it all depends on that make sense. In the universe the way of progress can only be one, evolve from darkness and ignorance representing evil, to light representing knowledge and justice.

Philosophy in favor of full justice also has its complexity, as it is to consider as true the assumption of eternal life of the spirit and the repetition of the cosmos indefinitely until all beings live through reincarnation all possible lives, i.e. that time would be repeated but in each repetition a different role from the previous cosmic cycle is live, then it would not be considered reasonable being unfair to others, living yourself one day those same lives. Moreover, in the case of make sense exceptions theory of justice would not be to question this, but considering that these future assumptions would not be important enough to alter the present circumstances. However although in the future the full justice as the best option is considered, the theory of exceptions justice will always serve to explain the way in primitive worlds its relationship with justice arising from a moral point of view, it is the way that people usually behave, perhaps not understanding the eternal and cyclical nature of the cosmos.




Arguably the scale ideal values would be like a pyramid in which justice would be at its highest point, i.e. all moral values that have to conform our mind this would be the most important because it is essential to create an organized society, i.e. the defense of peace and serious justice the essential value but that does not mean it was the only one because only represent a fraction of the total sum of the values but it would be the most important and coordinator element of all of them.

Although it is difficult to determine what values would be more important could be seen as defending the race would be second, because it is through the race as evolution has given to us the progress of the genes, nature determined that each climate corresponded one race and thus defend the existence of all of them without mixing is a moral obligation, the order should happen to chaos so that there is progress, and miscegenation only involves disorder, only the best climate on earth can determine the best race and more beautiful, which is represented in the white race, all races have the right to exist and to be free, but it is our duty to reject the abomination of miscegenation represents the lack of progress on this. Today on miscegenation is being used as an imperialist weapon primarily by the United States, for failing to recognize racial boundaries believed in the right to invade and interfere in the internal affairs of all races, try to obtain a material benefit from his victory militate against the Germans in the second world war, but keep in mind that what we fought in that war were nations no ideas, and this is a serious mistake to believe that because the Germans lost the war means that were wrong in all, there are currently only material interest in it because it is striking considering that before the war always was considered as a depraved conduct and tawdry favor miscegenation and instead now supported, but only with military and political purposes and, in a sense the power to dignity takes precedence.

Third on the order of values could put birth control, because it is absolutely necessary that every country has the number of inhabitants that their economy is able to sustain, it is fallacious to pretend trivialize this matter as do (NGOs) to affirm that developed countries should maintain population growth in underdeveloped free, because without control solid birth ever the hunger problem will be solved, but those (NGOs) do not pursue fight hunger for the poor are their business and source income, more could be considered as parasites of them as their allies, and for this reason they do nothing to make poverty disappear, only propose to get more food even knowing that without a birth control this will lead to more poverty, if really to worry of the poor is in birth control where their efforts would, that do not do shows where it is n impostors.

Fourth on the scale ideal values would defend social justice, meaning that in a world evolved in which there was a fixed number of inhabitants, the law should ensure that all its inhabitants had secured a job and housing upon reaching adulthood, thus the lives of many young people as it is today is not wasted, this is only possible when governments assume by law birth control, determining that each couple can have just two children most and in some cases three when circumstances permit. In this way every child from birth would have secured a job, and housing would be given to him by the state in the form of rent for life upon reaching the age of majority. In any case while it reaches the state should guarantee every citizen the right to an unemployment allowance minimum survival, but always in exchange for the willingness to work by the standing.

Fifth place could stand to defend real democracy, authentic expression of justice in the political arena, but not the false democracy that exists at the moment but a democracy in which laws were elected directly and individually by all citizens this does not interest the current political stakeholders only to allow the election of leaders and parties, in order to ensure their privileges.




Many people wonder how far the conquests of science will go, if all you can imagine is possible. In my opinion the achievements that are possible through science represent half between everything and nothing, i.e. that the process of evolution of the cosmos possible is necessary that this has some strong laws have irremovable be served as starting point and as a framework for subsequent development options.

From the existence of this group of unremovable basic laws would be the existence of a large number of variables options, i.e. we could find many differences in the universe but whenever they were not in contradiction between these basic laws, because absence such laws the universe would be meaningless and would not be possible to build an organized cosmos. So to the question that is possible in the universe the answer is that everything that does not contradict its fundamental basic laws, which could also be called laws of nature or God.

From here the question is: So what are these primordial laws? The answer is simple these laws exist and are in contact with them continually, but the difficult thing is to be sure what they are and which are not, what are the true cosmic values and which are false, because nature allows us to choose between different options, but if we're wrong we suffer the consequences when hitting those cosmic laws that are necessary for the universe works. It is therefore necessary to seek the truth and do not blind us with topical or preconceived ideas, it is necessary to doubt everything and reason all matters including the most deeply rooted religious beliefs and not because those beliefs are why be wrong, but because of it may be. When a man says to defend something just because he said a religious leader in the resignation antiquity of his own counsel and his judgment, we must not forget that although the religious leader had good intentions does not guarantee that their beliefs are true at all, the statement as used by religious organizations is a divine being and therefore infallible it is only a presumption and not a test and is used by them as a form of coercion to acquire power trying to impede the ability of analysis and discussion of the citizen.

We must therefore use that ability that nature gives us to seek the truth doubting religious topics in order to improve them, but not because they believe that those beliefs are in their false essence, but to correct their mistakes and adapt to a more evolved society.




It could be defined evolution as a series of circles placed one inside the other, the inner circles represent the earlier stages of evolution and outer circles the most advanced in this phase. Around each circle a series of points that actually represent the keys necessary to overcome each circle would meet. It could be said that evolution would be a line starting in the center and continue through each circle passing through each point of knowledge, once every circle completed a jump to the next level would then beginning to go the next circle. These theoretical assumptions can be experienced frequently in daily life to be shown as you need to discover numerous keys in simple principle to make a major breakthrough to pass at a different level of knowledge. Another example would be like a gradual buildup of stress in the tectonic plates of the Earth leads to a sharp and sudden as earthquake displacement, another example would be like the slow accumulation of scientific knowledge in the last ten thousand end years in a jump abrupt evolution in the twentieth century and still continues. Is that evolution is the way through a circle or evolutionary level that is necessary to find all the keys themselves that circle to move to the next, the process of discovering knowledge point around the circle is slow but After the discovery tour of key completed the jump to the next level occurs suddenly and quickly, to join the momentum that gives knowledge of all keys that circle, you can say then that evolution is not something that it occurs slowly or quickly, but most of the time evolves slowly, but once finished the tour of each level of knowledge a sharp and quick jump occurs to reach the next level of evolution. Once the world reach full self-realization in the technological field will return at a slow pace similar to the old levels change, but without losing the achievements, rapid progress is no longer necessary because you have everything you might need.


Chapter-3 POLICY




It is pathetic to see that when the media talk about freedom of opinion generally refer to the freedom to indulge the line marked by the great powers, this is because as soon as someone gets out of those preambles he is immediately accused of being antisocial and words are invented to associate your opinion with diseases in order to discredit him, these people are actually nothing more than opportunists who sail to are current and always associated with the power of his time these if they are a traitors to humanity, because it assumes that all ideas should be always respected that arises peacefully, but when someone leaves the truths established by the powers that immediately arise voices calling for them to tape the mouth is that perhaps fear citizens to express their right to think freely? These who speak of freedom of expression, but only when it favors what they want, are no better than those who burned scientists to tell the truth during the Middle Ages.

And I say this about those who today persecute those who oppose the mixing of races, or refuse to condescend to homosexuality, once invented words like xenophobia or homophobia in order to prevent citizens from entering assess the root the facts objectively, are not able to understand that respect is not the same work, and the fact that one respects those who support such things does not mean that this right, and therefore not obliged to cooperate with it, but these opportunistic only they expect the prize to go in line with the great empire of the United States, that empire which speaks of human rights and at the same time allows for millions of poor in the streets, usually of ethnic minorities, the empire supports miscegenation only to justify the occupation of the rest of the world, arguing that failing to recognize racial boundaries, nor have policies that recognize. It is true that the Nazis were cruel to ethnic minorities during World War II, but that does not mean that therefore we should destroy our own racial and cultural heritage through miscegenation, all races are entitled to live in freedom but that does not mean that miscegenation help to this end but on the contrary, today it is taboo to talk about this issue, the pro miscegenation say it is wrong to oppose the crossing of races because they say they are all part of the same species, but if the case of discovering a human species most backward on a desert island would also maintain the barbarous pretense of allowing the crossing of this with today's humanity and thereby destroy the fruit of thousands of years of genetic progress? Because they would oppose recognizing that differences in racial progress are possible, and therefore reject miscegenation is defensible without this implying a desire to harm the other races. So I consider it a mistake to oppose those who advocate peacefully rejection miscegenation or racial superiority, because this wave of support for the current crossbreeding does not pursue more than pandering to a new imperialism that seeks to justify claiming that his rejection of Nazi legitimizes them but actually only pursues the same imperialist aims. also they are mistaken who simply limited to condescend and justify Nazism in the Second World War, because that kind of ideology can only evolve if they are able to get away proposed by Hitler and recognize the right of all races to live freely approach, as the only used the movement for the defense of racial integrity because he believed he could further their nationalist interests, but that does not mean that that line of thinking is in itself bad, the Nazis actually only sought power and create in Germany a dictatorship and did not hesitate to lie and use anything that they thought that could favor them, they were carried away by extremism and that was a big mistake, but that does not mean why were wrong at all, as the victorious powers they would have us believe. The big mistake that was made after the Second World War was to believe that the defense of humanism and respect for racial rights necessarily implied acceptance of miscegenation, and such is not true.

Actually every race is different by its adaptation to different climates of the earth, and only for this reason it is justified to oppose the mixing of them, but it is also necessary to say that it is precisely these harsh climates that cause the existence of better races and worse, because perfection is the result of finding the right balance in everything and the racial question the European race represents that balance for having developed the climate ideal, in the future all races end up being the same, but not exterminations, nor by interbreeding, but because the result of the evolution of these will come a day when the progress of cities will create an ideal climate in all of them and consequently stimulate the development of races, to make them equal, but until that time comes it is absurd to destroy the racial miscegenation heritage. It is necessary to foster fraternal coexistence among all races, but that does not mean it's right that these are mixed. The progress of mankind is based on progress from chaos to order, from darkness to light, and that will only be possible if the decision of nature to divide mankind into different races is respected, since this division also represents progress.




It is regrettable to see how today the Germans are divided between those who are in favor of the victorious powers of the Second World War and therefore against Nazism, and who declare themselves against the victors of the war and consequently in favor of the Nazis, as both positions are wrong, there are many people who think that the only way to defend freedom is supporting the Nazis without understanding that it was precisely these that gave their country to foreign powers, praising Hitler as if God were considered unpatriotic to anyone who criticizes you, but if you care to know history are taken realize that Hitler was no military genius they believe, their only success during the war was the conquest of France, for all the rest were supposed successes and failures were actually concessions that gave Western nations in order to avoid war, but its policy was completely erratic, his first big mistake was to attack England without sufficient means attempting a blockade by sea when it had a fleet much lower than yours, and when his failure attacked Russia in order to conceal it was evident this was from a strategic point of view a military barbarity, for violating the peace treaty he was signed with her I condemn their country to certain failure by putting all major nations against her, if Hitler had stopped the war in this time surely would have ended, but his unlimited desire for power led him to perdition. It is true that the conditions of the Versailles Treaty that ended World War I favored the rise of Nazism, but it is also true that the Nazis had not come to power without the economic crisis of 1929, but it is necessary to consider that Crisis affected not only Germany but the whole world. The Nazis used a strong campaign of mental manipulation in order to convince the citizens that they understood them and they would be able to solve their problems by putting the Jews as allegedly responsible for all the evils they used them as a means for the society vent their discomfort with them, blaming an ethnic minority support from the remaining majority, so thus ensured the company did not realize that danger was in them and did not realize that Hitler's hatred of Jews simply It was because he did not were considered sufficiently nationalists for supporting these peace treaty in the first world war, however if a comparison of the results Germany is staying in a better position at the end of the first world war to the end of the second, so if you have to look unpatriotic obviously that would have to be, because with its disastrous policies condemn their country to ruin. Militarism is not always the solution, the pro-Nazi should note that the allied nations against Hitler awarded him almost everything he asked in order to avoid war and yet he was determined to provoke therefore evident his total ignorance of the possibilities that his country had to win the war. Those who today defend the Nazi thesis must understand that criticizing Hitler is not the same as criticizing Germany and be against Hitler does not imply being against Germany because Hitler can make mistakes like the rest of the people, thus the only way to progress is to understand this truth and therefore need to be willing to make a self-criticism and change those things that are wrong in their ideology, it is essential to accept that the defense of their race should never be linked to mistreatment of others. Actually the Nazis did not invent philosophy towards racial integrity, because he existed before them, but they served it only because they believed that could favor their nationalist ideas, therefore defend these ideas does not mean that you have to be in according to necessarily Nazi.

Also they are despicable who say everything about the Nazis was bad, because nobody is wrong in all, frivolously hidden in the Versailles Treaty conditions for Germany were excessively harsh, and the desire of the Nazis to unite all territories German culture under one banner was legitimate, but the mistake of the Nazis was knowing not find the right measure things because his desire for power was unlimited, as demonstrated when they locked themselves in jail his political opponents turning the country into a dictatorship. Nor was nothing wrong with the fact of wanting to defend their race against miscegenation, because for many German and European race was a symbol of identity that had to also defend for the Germans it had a special significance, because since the Romans tried to conquer the Germanic territories in the time of emperor Octavian distrust the West was higher, and in this sense the race was worth identity added. Well before the war to keep the pure race was considered by all as a symbol of good education and only after the German defeat this change, because from that moment those who were defending racial purity automatically were considered pro-Nazi and so both enemies of the victorious powers of war, as if it were the same thing, you can be against miscegenation but also against the Nazis, they forget that before the outbreak of the difficult war was to find someone who openly supported miscegenation, be in favor of maintaining the pure race or believe that a race may be more evolved than another does not mean for it being in favor of slavery or the mistreatment of other races, as happened with the Nazis. It is commonly accepted by all that the human species is superior to other animal species, but defend this does not mean that therefore the extermination of other species rests, therefore argue that the white race is more evolved than the rest of races also have to involve the abuse of these rests, as each plays a role in the earth and each must evolve peacefully and in freedom, it is actually adapting to different climates, in some extreme cases , which determines the differences between them, and why they are necessary, but this adaptation is also because the European race is in my best and most beautiful view to be in the area of land with a climate more balanced . It is also important to note that the fact that a race can be considered superior to another does not mean that therefore every individual of the most advanced race has to be considered better than each individual of the other races, it is only the evolutionary value means what changing, this does not apply to each person individually, because one person to another can be large differences, racial differences is on aesthetics where more accentuated, but that does not mean you have to be significant differences in other things like the level of intelligence for example, this does occur however when it comes to different species. Perhaps in time all races were to be equal when the man gets its technological advances create an identical artificial climate in cities that do evolve, but meanwhile crossbreeding is nonsense and a mockery of the natural order. At present the white race is causing their own extinction by refusing to take the seed needed to replace its inhabitants and to promote racial miscegenation, this really is a true crime against humanity but few want to acknowledge so as not to question preset topics.

After the war the Americans and French used their alleged support of miscegenation to justify their imperialist campaigns, tried to say that the fact of allowing miscegenation within its borders gave them the right to invade the territories of other races, so did the opposite of what they were proposing, i.e. invade and exploit those territories claiming to be for their good, when he moved them truly was greed, as happened in the invasion of Iraq, which lies to justify it were used and so to appropriate its oil, it is true that democracy is better than dictatorship, but that cannot be used as an excuse to do whatever they want and destroy a country, every nation must be respected so that it can evolve by itself without pretentiousness impositions, for these interferences only give ammunition to extremist groups, these behaviors condemn the West to lose their culture just by the desire for more money, as if the ethical principles they had no value, creating thus greater social tension by trying to impose racial mixtures but without really worrying about human rights, it would be fair return to the reason and give each ethnic minority territory within the United States by the percentage that corresponded and that each race can thus create their own free nation. It would also be correct that racial boundaries are respected in the world and that each race live in freedom and without mixing well to avoid the risk that others get into their own business.

It is therefore necessary that those who believe in the defense of racial integrity dissociate completely from the Nazi era and understand that the defense of one's own race does not have to be in contradiction with respect for the rights of others by. Nor should we forget that the first casualty of war is truth loser, its successes are considered flaws and defects winner are considered virtues, it is necessary to analyze things impartially, without being carried away by the comfortable opportunism of seeing things only for those who win wars, because they may have the power but not the reason.

Really is not that power and their media change the feelings of people, what changes is the way people think should express these feelings, making power is to direct these feelings towards their own interests, they modifying the interpretation of the facts are historical or scientific, for this reason after the war Nazi crimes were considered inhumane acts, but the Indian extermination in the United States a legitimate act of self-defense, all about how the events raised more than the facts themselves, even in cases involving similar situations. Is the same mental manipulation which was then used to justify the Iraq war. These governments use both lying and intimidation to achieve their ends, and many citizens tend to agree with them only out of fear and therefore accept their arguments without analyzing impartially, so the concept of what is prejudice and what not just it depends on what determine the dominant powers of the time. Speculators are also negligible during the war supported the Nazis and now fervent defenders of miscegenation declare, that kind of people do not seek the truth, only to profit harming society. People should ask what would have been his values to win the war the Germans would surely be very different, because it is not the same as saying it is fair to really be, the real challenge is to be able to seek the truth staying out ideological fashions of the times, because all power no matter how great carries a baggage of the same mistakes that hit, and this must know how to recognize. One day came a new era in which people no longer accept the leadership represented by justice and truth.




Since the end of the Second World War the discussion on the preservation of racial and cultural identity of each step to be a taboo subject people, but it is important to remember that even in the essence of the Christian religion there is a clear tendency to oppose miscegenation of races. It is pathetic to see how society considers as natural the existence of hundreds of varieties of each animal species and that they survive because instinctively refuse to cross each other, but nevertheless since the end of World War II is pursued proponents conservation without mixing human races, all because who lost that war proposed such ideas come you are so naive to think that anyone who loses a war has to be wrong at all? That pursues only one goal which is to consolidate and elevate the winner, which promotes mixing only in order to show different from the Nazis, but that his real intention is to hide while carrying out its own campaign of world domination. You need to understand that each race is the answer to the adaptation of the human species every climate of the earth. They forget that even in the very essence of Christianity is condemned as abominable such practices, but now this truth is muted. Because confused to defend racial identity does not have to involve desire no evil to others. They forget that it was nature itself which divided mankind into different races and are actually different although many insist on denying it. Because there is nothing dishonest in trying to maintain their own race without mixing and the fact that a person who believes in these ideas has committed a dishonest act does not imply that all those who have these ideas also are.


You will not plant in your vineyard two kinds of seed; because all be unclean, sowing seed which the product of the vineyard. (Deuteronomy 22.09)


It is true that it is wrong to assess the content of the Bible without making constructive criticism, as much that this book can be appreciated for its moral content, that's not a reason to stop using our own reasoning, especially if we that its supposed divine origin is somewhat alleged but not proven, as well as any changes that eventually these writings may have suffered.

But it is also true that anyone who now defends peacefully is morally right to maintain their own race without mixing is immediately silenced for not being in line with the prevailing power of the moment and that is also an opportunist act against freedom.

It is also important to emphasize that racial differences are primarily the result of the adaptation of each race to different climates of the earth and the fact that this adaptation can determine that some may be better than others should not be used as a pretext to pretend to have advantage over others, because although the mixing is considered an error above all we are all human beings with the same right to be happy and to live in freedom.




It is striking to see how the extremist Islamic groups show an increasing cruelty, and it is also striking that the number of supporters of these terrorist groups seems to gradually increase, it is unfortunate that this happens because their ideological approaches are manifestly contrary to respect for human rights and freedom of expression, i.e. are generally the worst elements of society who end up forming such groups and their ambition for power seems limitless.

However it is also necessary to remember that it is the greedy Western policy towards the Muslim world the main driver of these groups, as systematically whenever the UN poses a sanction against Israel for its policy of occupation and extermination of the Palestinian people United States the vein, when Israel kills its bombing hundreds of Palestinians most of them are civilians the Western world considers a simple news story, but when an Islamic terrorist group kills a Western all scandalized by saying it is an act against freedom and fraternity, is that they mean that the life of a Muslim is irrelevant, but an Israeli or an American not? The United States wants to show to the world how a judge and Lord fair, but how can be considered impartial who slaughters a million Iraqis leaving the destroyed arguing search for weapons of mass destruction that do not exist country, only an effort undercover to control its oil, while providing nuclear weapons to Israel, in addition to finance his army, knowing that this country takes decades illegally occupying Palestinian territory? At the end gives the impression of being true to say Islamist groups that we are witnessing a new covert crusade, because US policy is to provide all necessary means for Israel to steal more and more territories to the Islamic world through their settlements, and if a war is declared to have the possibility of exterminating their nuclear weapons, i.e. it can be assumed that the United States prefers to be Jews rather than Muslims who control the territories considered religious significance for Christians, but this It shows that in any case its policy has nothing impartially and continuous source of conflict between the Islamic world and the West. But the most unfortunate thing is that Israel is using the Palestinian people with the same policy of extermination that the Nazis used against them does not learn anything from what happened in the Second World War? And if not so why not return freedom to the occupied territories? The Western world is losing this issue a great opportunity to demonstrate freedom and fraternity that both preaches. It is true that extremists seek to impose the world a mentality of the stone age of modern times, but the saddest thing of all is that those countries the forefront of progress believe that cruelty to the world Islamic they are favoring the rise of such groups, they are causing the citizens of those countries confuse extremism freely.




It is unfortunate to see how the human masses tend to have a single thought; it is as if they do not want to take the trouble to analyze things in order to have an evolved opinion. From the moment in which an idea or ideological current happens to be assumed by the majority, it seems as if a mental black hole is formed that tends to attract people towards it, preventing them from abandoning such a dogma. But worst of all is that when someone tries to move away from such beliefs hyenas of society i.e. speculators are poured over attacking them mercilessly, these speculators interpret that departure as an opportunity to take advantage by distancing these people the truths or beliefs politically accepted by the majority, then speculators appear to others as advocates alleged mass when in fact only seek personal gain, such people do not seek the truth and are characterized each time by simply trying to take advantage of policies spurts always going with the flow, they are the same as during the Nazi era extolled the regime and from the end of the war vigorously pursued those who advocated racial purity peacefully. Speculators were also the McCarthyite in the United States tried to gain political benefit scaring citizens from those who simply exercising their right to think differently. Another example is the ideological rigidity of political parties in this system misnamed democracy, since different ideas to the dogmas of the initial orthodoxy are persecuted so that they end up considering that each party has to take a number of postulates as something inseparably attached to it and therefore immovable, turning at the same time I have rough unable to progress adequately. Similarly it tends to manipulate the minds of the followers of these parties that are trying to convince all evils correspond to the opposition parties and all the virtues to himself. This will not end until society realizes that it is necessary to pass from voting parties to vote on ideas. Another example is religious dogmas, the leaders of such organizations proclaim the infallibility of its principles to create a mental dictatorship, pretending to citizens who think freely is an attack against God or religion, but do not say is that the last thing they care about is good or truth and only used such arguments to their advantage, making believe citizens who doubt the dogma is wrong, these rascals pretend considered God's representatives when only serve Satan, and intended to consider the truth as an exclusively his property without room for any difference of opinion. People should look at things objectively and unmask those speculators who scare people with lies and thus achieve a truly free society.

The world has become a great facade in which the important thing is not democracy but to pretend that there is democracy, the important thing is not justice but to pretend that there is justice. But it is not possible to solve this without assuming a certain dose of self-criticism, because in reality a world always has the government it deserves, because the low moral character of the political class is only the symptom of the low moral character of society which represents and in many cases has voted.




It is regrettable to see how the great nations tend to lean too easily to war and imperialism, an example of this is seen in the excessive tendency of the United States to seek wars with which to pay for arms companies by major economic support received during election campaigns. When these parties funded enterprises came to power arms they return the favor provoking wars to justify military spending.

At the beginning of the Cold War the United States considered appropriate allying with Israel in its confrontation with the Soviet Union for world domination and that resulted in many of the Islamic countries became enemies to be at odds with Israel's policy theft of land to the Palestinians and Islamic countries became a field to create appropriate test to justify wars with arms spending.

On the other hand the United States was fixated on creating a circle of allied countries around Russia with which to strangle his influence, hence its interest attract the governments of the Baltic and Ukrainian republics, also carried out a policy of continuous interference in the internal policies of the countries of the middle East using the pretext that only wanted to impose democratic models for their sake, but could not hide their interest in mastering their internal policy to assist and control the oil business.

After that it went to fund Islamist guerrillas to overthrow governments that were not favorable to them in Afghanistan and Syria without considering that these guerrillas derive in many cases anti-Western terrorist groups.

After the destruction of Iraq in the two Gulf wars this country was so weakened that it could not contain the entry of terrorist groups such as the Islamic state, in a way also funded by the US to overthrow the Syrian government, especially as I said not in order to promote democracy but to take support Russia in its fight for world domination. This shows that the recent Middle East policy by the United States is considerably wrong because Islamic countries have the perception that only a relationship with them arises through force and intimidation while Israel is allowed theft land and extermination of Palestinians finally after all are Muslims.




Formerly the councils of peoples organized parties regularly because of the difficulty of citizens to make them individually today in modern cities there are plenty of nightclubs prepared for it, for this reason it is incomprehensible that municipalities cause quite often collapses in the normal activity of the only cities in order to organize parties, it represents a clear violation of citizens' rights to rest and silence. It is regrettable that human beings store both doing things en masse and as if in response to a hypnotic pulse, condescend to the shows organized by municipalities in an authentic display of alcohol and consumerism, that behavior more resemble a herd of wildebeests in the jungle a group of intelligent people. The same goes for the fireworks, it is surprising that the population will impress something that is essentially nothing more than an immense succession of more like a bombing explosions at a party, especially if we consider that part of the population such as young children or animals are cruelly tormented by these explosions but no one seems to care, it is reasonable that society applies in this sense some sanity and decide to perform noisy activities only in the soundproof rooms created for it. Municipalities have a duty to be neutral and refuse to turn the streets into simple taverns or nightclubs, albeit temporarily, their duty is to consider public health and the rights to rest as their priorities and not mere profit motive that these scandals represent. An evolved society is characterized by knowing that the interests of one party do not have to impose on others.




It would be desirable to think that the hippies were a peace movement as they normally tend to believe, but the truth is that the movement and the Vietnam War have a direct relationship, because the alleged pacifism attributed to them is nothing more than a rejection reaction to participate in a war that anyway had little social support, because in this case it was not a defensive war but clearly assaulting a foreign country and therefore it was logical that many citizens opposed to risk their lives in that war or accept a forced recruitment. The truth is that the hippies were nothing but a bunch of drug addicts and promiscuous sexual degenerates who simply proclaimed themselves pacifists only in order to avoid participating in the war, it once this term movement also disappeared. These types of groups or sects are the ideal breeding ground for fraudsters who only seek evil try to get a role they do not deserve, presented to others as pacifists and say preach the good when they carry within more than selfishness and lust for power, these unwanted sex call it love because what they want is sex and no love when they are two very different things, can have sex but love is not the same as they would have us believe.




Usually it tend to think that law and justice are the same but such a thing is wrong because the law should do justice but not always so, because first of all the law represents the interests of the government that is not always in line with the interests of citizens. An example of this is in the dry law enacted in the US in the twenties of the last century, that law was promoting public health but back to the citizens, meaning that instead of convincing society of the harmful alcohol consumption is threatening and coercing opted for sanctions, this caused a rift between the government and citizens who disregarded such requirement as a result there was a great development of the underground alcohol market. One could say then that in some cases the expansion of mafia organizations rather than being merit of them is the consequence of the lack of respect for the rule to civil rights. Because in some ways they were representing the right of society to exercise their free will and therefore these illegal companies were doing justice to offer people what the state forbade them arbitrarily, therefore in this case the classic definition who represented good and who represented evil is confused because there is no clear answer. The most reasonable thing would have been to create an information campaign to explain the injury representing drug use while respecting the final decision of the citizens, to end the state relented and the dry law was abolished with what was demonstrated that the power of governments cannot do everything and that although the end is just that cannot be imposed in violation of the freedom of choice of society, because however honorable it so it does not necessarily justify the means employed to achieve it and the duty of governments it is to respect the free will of citizens when it comes to deciding on his own life. From that moment the state and citizens came to classify alcohol and snuff as good drugs simply because they had been more traditional and therefore to pursue the others, this was an act of blatant hypocrisy because alcohol is the drug that causes more deaths, but to make such a distinction somehow seemed moral citizens remain intact to blame for all the ills to other drugs. The state should end this situation and promote the eradication of drugs but peacefully and without coercion, using measures such as stop considering drunkenness an extenuating circumstance for crimes committed as now in some countries, since such measures more to help eradicate such consumption helps to encourage it, it is clear that only when the state and citizens call things by their name this may change.

Another example of the distance that sometimes exists between law and justice is like some criminal codes establish the right of criminals to obtain compensation for injuries they might suffer during the commission of a crime, in this case the bad faith is evident the law, because its duty is to do everything necessary to discourage the offender to commit crimes and not to encourage it, because if the argument of the law to justify this measure is that the victim's act of defense had caused injury the aggressor higher than justified, then it is logical to hold accountable the victim for their excess, but never reward a criminal for what might happen in their criminal activity.

It is unfortunate that often when a crime is reported, the law or do nothing or take a position clearly in favor of the offender, just not wanting to take measures involving public spending. Clearly the weakness and neglect in many of the penal codes of these false democracies, because not only refuse to do justice, but in many cases collude with criminals.




It is a pity to see how from the education system to children who live in a democracy is inculcated, gives the impression that what they really want is to create a society of obedient servants faithful, but how can be considered a model of democracy to a the only system that allows is to elect political leaders, but no option to directly decide the laws that govern us? it is clear that what they want is to convince citizens that what they have is a democracy, even knowing that such a thing is false. But the most outrageous of all is that those politicians who call themselves decent, are the same as applaud when a politician thief is pardoned after serving a ridiculous part of his sentence without having returned the stolen, those politicians who act this may not be considered rather than as accomplices of others to such behavior. As you can believe in the political agenda of those proposing the release of serial murderers or rapists after serving only a fraction of their sentences, and this systematically, they include in their criminal codes the release of criminals in a short time regardless of the seriousness of their crimes is that perhaps identify with them? it is clear that what they do is prepare the penal code when you apply them. These rascals politicians talk about being humanitarian with criminals, but they refer to patronizing criminals or thieves like them, never do justice to the victims, which they despise, as only they consider them mere funding of their parties . These hypocritical politicians, immediately you say, justice has been done, have served their sentences, but they know that this statement is false because the laws are designed so that impunity is standard. Most politicians call themselves decent but how many of them are in favor of removing their privileges? They put the measure with which society should judge them. These rascals political friends of criminals immediately say, prison is only reinserted, but such a statement is false because the prison primarily aims to remove from society those who do not deserve to be in it, and if the severity of their life imprisonment sentences determine the right thing is that compliance would always be reasonable to release in the case of finding evidence of his innocence, but otherwise the priority has to be the victim not the criminal. Other times they say, criminals have repented, but is there any criminal case that have repented not say immediately after entering prison? These friends of criminals, with whom they identify, they forget that who takes a life of intentional and premeditated need not decide on his own, and if society believes that the fair payment is an example keeping you in prison then it is entitled to apply. Reinsertion is always desirable, but for criminals who deserve it, but who takes a life cannot expect society to stop thinking about your tastes or if you have repented or not, because for those who have a conviction for centuries that It needs not apply logically would correct a reduction of sentence for good behavior, but a reduction is not an annulment, because the crimes are not canceled, and therefore it is reasonable that such reduction is of a minority of the total, if what is sought is to do justice.

These politicians, false democrats, do not hesitate to use the threat to citizens to participate in the electoral system, because there are many countries in which fines those who refuse to collaborate with deceit by refusing to vote or participate in the polling stations. They are wrong who think that the system can be changed from within, as if it is a false democratic model the only solution is to reject and refuse to participate in it, until those in power give the hint, participate in the game parties is to fall into deception. Clearly, when the thief is the one who makes the laws cannot be expected to do justice.

Actually existing political systems are nothing more than a mere imitation of Greek models of the V century BC, left-wing parties claim to care about workers but by supporting illegal immigration all they do is promote a slave society like the frivolous Athens. Right-wing parties have no obsession that perpetuate the privileges of the rich like Sparta slaver. That game left and right to bring the parties want is nothing but a fiction, the truth is neutral and not subject to any party. The world needs a new way of conceiving democracy; a system by which laws are directly elected by citizens, only then this kind of political tricksters and thieves can be eradicated from society permanently.




Today it is striking to see how society seems to become increasingly important to an asymmetric approach to life, art for example is expressed increasingly through deformity incoherence and absurdity, an example of this is in the Guggenheim museum Bilbao, which from his alleged works of art to architecture of the building all this represents the asymmetry and deformity, this is an example of how a society aimless expresses its definition of art, or what create art, this is a society without God, but not because God has abandoned them but because they have turned their back on God. Is not it true perhaps that in nature all things usually follow a symmetrical shape? The roundness of the planets, the shape of our bodies, that symmetry is actually the expression of order and logic which is one of the factors that connect man with God, but this current society feels omnipotent with its technological development, feel invincible and do not hesitate to repeat the mistakes of the past, this society forgets people and just think about the mere economic productivity, this society goes increasingly quickly towards a based model miscegenation and slavery, and asymmetry and social disunion that entails, and only for profit companies, but what good is talking about the growth of companies, or high per capita income, if people are unhappy with this situation of miscegenation and delinquency causes uncontrolled immigration, growth is not the only thing that also has social order and integration that same culture and race represent, but society does not want to see it because that sea beast that is the United States so it makes believe, is presented to the world as the great defender of freedom, but its policy is based on imperialism and submission of the world to their interests, this rule does not certainly when you are interested in supporting dictators or overthrowing only democracies so that their companies can deplete the world's resources, it is only necessary to see the average income of an American and a citizen of Africa to discover their deception, even within the United States itself the social inequalities are outrageous and successive governments do not do anything about it, meanwhile in international politics make propaganda in favor of miscegenation but only as a strategy to promote world domination, day after day advertise how bad were the Nazis, but only for people not offer resistance to domination they seek to impose, because now they are new dictators disguised as democrats. What is the difference between being dominated by the Nazis or being dominated by a country of mestizos sodomites? That is what has become the United States, we try to make people believe that this is an ideal situation, but only pursue world domination. This shows that in the world everything is relative and the concept of democracy is not different, the truth is that current political systems are far from real democracy, but do not hesitate to use this as an excuse to justify the interference in the affairs of other states, but not in order to promote democracy, but to support their selfish interests, as was done during the Roman empire, actually is not that the US government supports miscegenation as an end, it just tries to take advantage of his victory against the Nazis, as if they were trying to dominate the world with a racist policy then they to get the same need to use a pro miscegenation policy as a way for that citizens do not realize that pursue the same goals of the Nazis, but at the cost of destroying the social order, i.e. they appear inside and outside its borders support miscegenation but only to gain time to get your goal is submission of the world to their interests, but society increasingly feel more dissatisfied with this situation, but the worst thing is they do not know what remedy do not understand that the first casualty in war is truth loser, do not understand that the racial question the Nazis were right and to achieve a developed society this must be based on a stable order, whereby each live in peace and harmony in the world but race mixing, because each race was made by nature to live in different climates, society must understand that being in favor of respect for the rights of all races does not mean you have to support miscegenation, because in fact that miscegenation only serves as a vehicle for cause more disorder and social inequality. But this society aimlessly is just repeating the same mistakes of ancient Rome, to bet on a model of mixed and slave society, now no longer it called slavery, but from a comparative point of view the economic situation of these people far from it. Because the best way to guarantee the rights of each race is that each has a recognized territory, which is not possible interference from other races in their own affairs, thus genuine freedom itself would have.




It is surprising to see how these subhuman try to seize power in the world would have us believe that care workers when all they do is agree in the shade with murderers and terrorists, those subhuman seeking partnerships with all the world's dictators to seize power and whose sole political objective is the submission of society to his dictatorship. These populist subhuman would have us believe that communism is a solution when failure is evident even in those countries that developed it. They intended to give us lessons of economy when their only project is the waste of public resources, proposed borrowing as a solution to all problems but how will indebt a country that is already in debt? It is that for them the balanced management of the economy has no meaning? Because a model country is one that depends on its own resources no resources of others, because these guys what actually plan is asking for money and then not return it and that's a mean-spirited conduct unbecoming of what you can expect from a government. It is true that a country can borrow, but only as part of a low debt situation, because that money will gladly want to ask to return and of course with interest, but this is not populist tell citizens. For an equal government that a person when he is honored, find the solution to their problems arranging their internal imbalances without trying to convey their problems to others through borrowing as this solution can only be exceptional but never a way of life, because it is only fair that a nation depends on what it produces and not what others produce. It is therefore necessary to review those things that are wrong in the economy to work depending on their own resources, particularly avoiding unnecessary corruption and wastefulness. An example of this is in the present public health fraud, it is not the same earmark money to care for the sick to make sure that money really goes to the purpose for which it was intended, since in many cases is lost in an unjustified overvaluation of treatments, or the monopoly of the intermediaries involved in healthcare. This is a health system too interested in buying drugs, but little interested in curing diseases.

They intended to propose themselves as a substitute for religion when he has never been a nation where the political model has benefited its citizens, rely on populist statements claiming seek the good of the workers but only covet the power to create a dictatorship they destroy everything they touch because all that is in their intentions is selfishness. Because there is no more despicable than robbing a poor thing and that is precisely what they do. These individuals claim to be concerned about human rights, but at the same time calling for serial murderers sentenced to life imprisonment meet only a fraction of their sentences, it is clear that when they speak of rights do not relate to the victims.

It is true that a developed nation is characterized by caring for all its citizens including those who are in a disadvantaged situation, but these populist what they want is not help but use that argument as an excuse to seize power at the same time They are destroying their own country. For an economy progresses is one that rewards work and not vagrancy and therefore it is essential that as much as possible contributory aid are returned by citizens to the state by creating a work program.

It is also true that trying to recover an economy by reducing wages is a ridiculous solution and especially highlights the lack of talent of the political class, because reducing the salaries of those who earn the least causing a contraction economy, considering that those with the lowest wages generally spend everything they earn and therefore this measure can only lead to a reduction in business. So the best remedy for an economy to function without fear is taking an economic model that rewards work against excessively subsidization models and therefore the economy is more oriented towards full employment than to the state agency. Because when an economy tends to solve everything with grants or cover absences from work by paying workers less missing in the end what occurs is an injustice to them, is not that the system cannot create insurance to cover such absences, what does not make sense is that the emphasis is on who's working, so the perfect model is one in which we help anyone who needed, but demanding also lose your part and responsibilities for these absences are shared to equally between the company and the worker in order that this is not used as an excuse for laziness or lack of work unjustified. Therefore a perfect economy is one that rewards work, but at the same time helps those who need it by demanding an effort in return, with which to return the favor received. Because an economy can only be competitive when it is grateful to those who strive to develop it, otherwise it only leads to unemployment and lack of competitiveness, because in the end those who actually end up paying for these efforts are the same workers who support the companies.

It is also essential to fight corruption, fomented by the politicians themselves, but that did not end until the penal code to be modified and the political class no longer get away with judicial proceedings in which it is processed, the problem is that when the thief it is the law that makes it very difficult to solve.




The world is getting closer to his last battle, but not war between nations but a battle between good and evil, light and darkness, ignorance and knowledge, a war that is not done with tanks and rifles but exists within each person, because the moral development is really the last stage in the process of evolution of humanity, that process has been delayed continuously by the fact that the philosophical progress is at odds with economic progress as to make it possible that development is necessary to have time have privacy to meditate, because it is through meditation and philosophy and the more profound progress is the highest concentration is the usefulness of the results, but human life through history has been a continuous struggle for survival that has left very little opportunity to develop inner awareness, but that awareness is to assess what Unlike a being evolved from one that is not. Arguably philosophy is food for the spirit and who thinks he can live without principles is wrong, as are those principles that help us relate to the universe in a fruitful way, so the man of the future consider his inner development as its greatest value, and the defense of right and justice as the core of their behavior.






What is the true definition of the devil? In my opinion is the wrong course of action that leads to suffering. Can you then say that the devil is not a living being? Not necessarily because when a person becomes evil in its raison d'être then it gives life to the devil by himself. When vanity becomes the determining factor in how to be a person at that moment it is like the devil incarnate who lived through it, is not so is any possession as normally understands, but a psychological issue, as is but the consequence of having oriented the wrong side, so the correct way to expel this demon is simply to teach the consequence of their actions to the person who commits iniquities, by provided teaching or punishment.

So what these exorcisms? From my point of view the call possession as understood in common so you can have several explanations, on the one hand there is the possibility that it is the result of the attempt by a spirit of someone recently deceased to return to life trying to steal the body the one who had contacted him through methods such as Ouija board or similar, in this case the intruder spirit represent the role of alleged demon when questioned by church members simply respond in line with the preconception they had him those who perform the exorcism, known ability to speak in tongues would be one of the qualities of the spirit, for those who accept life before and after birth this would not be so strange, just at birth memory spirit off so as not to interfere with the new plane of existence.

It is also possible to confuse mere emotional disorders with alleged possession of an evil spirit, in this case it may be that the person subjected to exorcism is limited to playing the role that would be expected of it representing an alleged possession in a mental state that would be more correct defined as hypnotic suggestion, induced by the exorcist, no doubt that an organization like the Catholic church full of scandals for their wicked behavior both past and present, find it extremely beneficial to appear before the world as alleged saviors of the exorcised people, it is as if a demon asked him to save someone from the possession of another. Although it is also true that no one is evil absolutely. Actually the devil is essentially a psychological issue and hurt wearer because it could be defined as vanity when it takes over a person and only creates problems by giving an unrealistic view of things, why the devil you have to destroy and eliminate him from our minds, because who intends to deal with evil weakly, only gives you options grown, with evil cannot act with ambiguity must be destroyed completely. One must defend well as the lynchpin of being, because if it is ambiguous about evil grows and destroys wearer.




Today many people deny God saying there is that if there should intervene in human life, but citizens would be willing to lose their free will by an order imposed by superior beings? The answer is certainly no. Since in this case would live in a dictatorship, the world needs to reach the truth that makes free through their own free will to them.

But people feel dissatisfied and do not understand that a vitiated atmosphere in which everyone is faced with all and all this because more than miss God there is a false god, i.e. that society has gone breathes worship the false god called Western materialism, proclaiming its defense of democracy but only apparent way as a means to exploit human beings, a false God that considers the mercantilist production as its sole objective, a false god who does not hesitate to sacrifice race, social order or the weather in order to get that purpose. This false God proposes to citizens to accept miscegenation as well as its only effect is to turn a slave to the working class, by causing falling wages and deteriorating civic coexistence, but more surprising is that the left parties as support, away from his duty to provide for the good for those who represent, just as happened when those same left parties opposed the abolition of slavery in the United States and those who say worry about the workers are at the same time their executioners. I do not intend here praise of communism because such a system is also wrong, because hinders progress and economic activity by preventing the free existence of companies also make the mistake of blaming religion for the crimes committed by religious organizations, when they are two very different things besides the Communists in their supreme arrogance intended to propose its ideology as an alternative religion, which is surprising for something that destroys everything it touches. But Western materialism is not a solution to prevail commodity production on the division of property, or quality of life, creates a society of trenches within cities to not try to end social precariousness, a society in constant war between citizens themselves, a messy and disjointed society in a social, racial and cultural chaos. These leftist parties say worry about workers but only intended to create a slave society in his day made the sensationalist Athens, which propagandized democracy while enslaving entire villages, trying to take communion citizens with a model social miscegenation based on destroying the quality of life of the working class they claim to defend. You need to create another social model that punish vagrancy, but to help those who are trying to work and fail to create a society without unemployment, a society that gives more importance to the eradication of poverty than commodity production, a society that return to God and reconsider the moral and decent behavior as its core values. It is necessary that the world rejects this false god of Western materialism that promotes disorder and promiscuity, that false God that denies life after death, it is necessary to a life based on decency and not to consider money as the only goal.




It is regrettable to see how those who know science are believed intended to question the existence of God, in the background gives the impression that his arrogance intended to take his place, this is the consequence of living in a society that seems to consider only one materialist view of life, these scientists who deny God's existence and spirit think they know everything, but only study the matter from a superficial view, wonder why the particles behave as they do but refuse to recognize that there is life in these particles are beings of gray mind that basically lack the courage to recognize anything of a spiritual nature even logic.

These materialistic scientists say that the existence of God is not logical because they say what if God created the world then who created God? They fail to understand that the fact that the classical concept of God can be wrong does not mean that there cannot be another true and consistent with a scientific approach to it. But it is even more foolish to claim that the failure to consider valid the classic definition of God implies therefore reject any ethical or religious idea, because religion goes beyond the existence or nonexistence of God, because first of all is a philosophy that tries understand the meaning of the cosmos and what science is not yet able to explain. If these materialistic scientists acknowledge making mistakes it is also logical that recognize the right to defend the existence of a philosophy or religion.

To my mind the classic definition of God as a bearded be raised in a cloud is wrong, but over time all cultures have believed in some form of God because it is the simplest way to define the creative mechanism of nature and it is undeniable that the universe has followed a logical process and coordinated development, therefore it is only right to define God as those laws that govern the universe since its inception, such immutable laws based on truth. It is logical therefore understand God as something that was before the universe, but God is part of the universe but as an element coordinator him. It could be said that God is part of us because somehow we are all creators. God really consists of everything that exists planets, stars, galaxies, people, but its exact definition are the laws grounded in the truth that govern the cosmos, when we think of the divine is in those universal laws that thought. Arguably divine is all that is beautiful and it is well done, it is the best expression of universal perfection.

There are also those who deny the existence of God saying that if there would have to intervene in human directly life or through superior beings to prevent injustice, but if such an occurrence would be nothing more than a dictatorship, the world should be guided by the road right by their own will, not by force, as well as belief is based on seeing God as a person, when it is much more logical to define it as the universal laws coordinators of this scenario we call world and therefore it is logical that neutral . This does not mean that God does not act, then what we call divine punishment is nothing more than the consequence of forgetting the laws of nature and many of our ills are the result, before blaming God we do an analysis of the reasonableness of our own actions. God does not create the universe as part of it, but it is the element that coordinates because the universe is not created nor destroyed only transformed.

Another example of arrogance by these materialistic scientists is their stubborn determination to deny the possibility of intelligent life beyond Earth, and especially the possibility that life may have visited earth at some point, say the vast distances separating the stars make it impossible, but they as scientists who are should recognize that science which is impossible at a time is routine in the next and although it is true that it is not easy to cross the distances between the stars an advanced civilization would have had thousands of millions of years to reach earth before our present time as to think that such a thing was not able to happen also would not need to move directly from their planet to us, for those who would come to earth centuries later would be the descendants the first space travelers after colonize worlds that would separate their planet Original ours, basically this effort to deny this truth seems more an attempt to prevent rob them center stage, as if in the cosmos could not be anyone wiser than they prefer flattery by pandering to the official truth criticism derived defend different positions, these materialistic scientists remind their positions with the time when the church called unscientific who said that the earth was not the center of the universe. It is true that in order to affirm the certainty of something must present enough hard evidence, but it is also true that many who are benefiting from these statements because they do not have the courage to recognize when something is logical.




It is pathetic to see how this modern society categorizes old and mediocre because of the wide expanse that idolatry had in antiquity. In the past it was common in all cultures had many gods and idols with which the company tried to appease his fear of the unknown, today people are believed superior to them claiming to have banished such beliefs, but such is not truth because what difference is there between the ancient gods each related to something other than nature and current dolls representing Christs, virgins and saints? It is that perhaps the fact assert that all these idols are descended from one religion prevents question of a ritual so lacking scientific basis as the ancient idols. Is not it true that these dolls perhaps virgins and saints fulfill the same function as in the past met idols? For each job a doll or saint who is invoked asking protection is used, I've even during processions are taken out for a walk as if they were people. Such savage customs are just another form of polytheism concealed under the umbrella of the Catholic church that tolerates it in order to get the loyalty of followers, but such a practice violates even the very essence of the Christian religion as can be seen in this quote biblical.


Not tremble in fear

when they see signs in the sky,

as do other nations.

Religious customs of these people

They have no value.

They go to the forest, cut a tree,

and a craftsman is giving it shape.

Others adorned with gold and silver,

they fasten it with nails and hammer

so you will not fall.

"These idols can not speak;

They seem scarecrow

in a field strewn with melons!

They have to take

because they can not walk,

so do not worship;

can not help them

nor can hurt them. "(Jeremias-10)


But the Catholic Church tells us that their idols are valid for being of the same religion, but such a statement is false because his only intention is to exalt itself by the rise of religious characters and control the free will of citizens. Because the more religious characters are converted into idols more will be idolized the church itself and therefore greater will be the manipulation of humanity, the aim sought by the church is declared itself infallible and get absolute power on earth through the total control of the human mind. Man must seek his own self and reject those tyrants who stand between him and God just for the sake of power, because there is no greater divine value the truth and the truth that we must worship and not to the people represented in those plastic idols. Is abominable create idols representing religious characters because people are just one more piece of evolution and are exposed to mistakes like the others, it is true that over time many people have contributed to the progress of humanity your ideas or philosophies, but unless proven otherwise these people are men and not gods, and only when it is realized that the truly divine is ideas, not people humanity will truly advance.




It could be said that happiness is determined by two dimensions that could be defined as crystalline and solar, solar dimension is what governs the pleasure you get with power and wealth, or provided by technology and arguably is represented by red color, crystal dimension is controlling the pleasure derived from simple things, intelligence and common sense, and is represented by white color, happiness is the result of achieving balance both dimensions and only can be reached at its maximum degree if its rules are respected, for it may be the case that a person is immensely rich and yet unhappy, and another is poor but happy, money can help achieve happiness but is not determinative of it therefore respect the rules of the crystal dimension it is essential, for this reason it is essential to fulfill their essential rules such as live decently and honesty. This bipolar feature that has happiness is not exclusive to it, because in the universe most things they do, and is derived from the division of the cosmos into positive and negative poles that is the source of such gender or poles magnetic. Those who do not respect these rules of nature become despots and that makes it harder to feel satisfaction with what they do, as if his soul was covered with a crust that prevent them from seeing the light, these brutish souls tend to find more money than would normally require because they are unable to feel sensations and believe that only with greater wealth they can get, so this kind of people occur more frequently in important positions than would correspond, however his belief that the money will give them happiness is wrong because only when rebalanced his soul find peace sought only when it eliminated despotism will feel happiness again and his soul will be free.




Is truly beautiful get carried away by the imagination or immerse yourself in extensive philosophical investigations, through meditation one can travel through time and space and discover those things that only carefully can be understood, but it is important to always remain calm and not be swayed easily by the statements of writers and religious leaders for much prophets or contacted proclaim themselves, because in many cases this is nothing more than a strategy of mental manipulation, which it is trying to make us lose our free will so that we submit to their wishes and opinions in this regard the official traditionally skeptical science has at least positive that analyzes things in perspective, although it lacks sufficient capacity to recognize the extraordinary when this happens. Sometimes skepticism is nothing more than an excuse to hide the lack of courage to admit the obvious.

I do not exclude the possibility that in the past philosophers or prophets may have come in contact with superior beings or aliens who have transmitted them to his teachings, but neither have to accept the arguments of anyone who claims to have had such contacts, without existing evidence regard conclusive. The truth is that when in doubt most likely truth is usually but not always.

In fact, the universe is full of wonders and amazing things, but we must not accept the arguments of those who seek to monopolize the truth for their own benefit, nor the attitude of those who deny everything just because they cannot control.

Actually philosophy and religion are sciences whose mission is the moral development of mankind, therefore consider whether the religious foundations have a divine or human origin is secondary, the important thing is to extract the useful values of all ideas in order to create a religion based on truth. For the truly divine is ideas, not people, because the real ideas are those that advance humanity.




Actually a philosopher does not tend to seek solitude that is this a goal in itself, is away from others because they do not understand their concerns, the philosopher really what you want is to discover better then able to share world is not its aim being alone, because nobody could want such a thing, loneliness is therefore the instrument to concentrate and see the future world uniting science and meditation, these findings most non can understand, because of ignorance and difficulties of the life. Not being loneliness an end but a means, not be ruled out that a philosopher share your life with a family or have a certain social relationship, because life can fit many things and different stages. If we consider that the purpose of philosophy is to improve the quality of life of people, then neither is that there is nothing wrong with the fact that the philosopher his findings apply to himself, living the ideal life you wish for others, life does not have to be just meditation, it is also correct to perform what one has dreamed of.




The truly unfortunate destructive cults is that they believe their followers who are better than others just because they belong to them, inflates his ego so that vanity becomes the main obstacle to leave because of considering such of course it would be traumatic to recognize that not only is not better than others, but also has been stupid enough to think that it is better just for the sake of serving the sect, without ever having bothered to prove the veracity of the postulates presented by the leader, i.e. just following the cult because this does nothing but flatter them, but with the sole purpose to use them. At the end the Adept ends up giving more importance to believe better than others having memorized his postulates that question the meaning of these, and is not that these assumptions may not be true in part because the most dangerous in these organizations are not his ideas but the desire of the leader to be considered as an unquestionable being, because it is a person with a desire for unlimited power, because they actually have the mentality of a dictator or a tyrant, the worst is when these characters are they put the adjective infallible in order to deny others the right to use their ability to reason. Many people ask but then what is the difference between a religion and a destructive cult? It is true that many widespread religious organizations such as Catholicism use their own methods of destructive sects, because like they demand absolute obedience and deny their followers the right to dissent, exalt their religious characters describing them as saints or divine only hinder an objective and scientific analysis of them, and so have absolute control over their minds, abducting their freedom of thought. For this reason it is important to separate the concept of religion of religious organization, as a religion is a set of philosophical ideas that are part of the culture gathered through the centuries, however a religious organization only seeks to use religion as an instrument for wrest power from governments have imposed a dictatorship. Not that the concept of divine cannot have a logical basis, but divine should be considered only the good ideas, because God is really all that is well done, but it is not correct to apply it to people because they can make mistakes. The ideal religion is one that considers freedom of thought as one of its fundamental principles, without accepting as infallible any of its principles or founders and has as its ultimate objective to achieve a just and based on truth society, there is nothing wrong in which the company has a religion, rather the contrary a society cannot be considered evolved without at the same moral, the important thing is to reject those who try to serve religion to gain power as a dictator, trying to tell others what is right and what is not, as if truth be alone in them, so religious organizations must disappear to give rise to a world based on peace and freedom. This does not mean that the universe can be no absolute truths, what is that all citizens have the right to speak freely about it.

There are also those who adhere to sects for lack of affection, that is what really seeking is a group of friends to replace the family who have not, in this case leave the sect would the problem of losing those friendships, as is common in destructive cults induce their followers to reject those who do not belong to them, in order to hinder their march and keep them more controlled. The problem of these sects is that in the end everything is subordinated to the leader and determines they should believe and what not, the measure of truth is what determines the leader becoming the sect into a real mind dictatorship, it is therefore important not relate to any organization that limits freedom of thought, you can always find friends or philosophical orientation without having to rely on such organizations. It is also pathetic to see how some political parties coalesce with religious organizations to increase their power, these parties give these organizations power and money and in return they give them the excuse to hide their crimes, but they are not better people for opposing these organizations attack religion, because confuse one thing with another, because every society needs a code of moral to live values, which do not need are some organizations that use religion as an excuse to exercise mind control over citizens .




It is regrettable that in this world there are so many impostors, such as in the case of those who write about ufology, did not have the courage to recognize when a statement is a fact and when it is the product of his imagination? Because of him the true facts are considered false and false true, just what suits who try to hide the truth, these scoundrels accused officers scientists from simple in its conclusions, but at least these scientists do not deceive people as they do, these individuals only seek profit using lies to get it, it would be more honest if they were limited to writing science fiction novels rather than deceive people, these individuals do not have dignity and therefore citizens should show their deepest rejection .

But unfortunately we live in a miserable society of miserly time, a society in which the law does not pursue criminals but pursues payroll, an offender can be tried for robbery with threats and yet be released after the trial without punishment just for being insolvent, while another citizen being convicted of irrelevant things to huge fines simply by having a payroll, this is an act of supreme negligence on the part of those who made the law by showing interest in the mere collection and breaching its duty to do justice.

Gives the impression that the world had implemented the law of every man for himself and everything had become a circus of impostors including politicians and the media and all for the profit motive, creating sensational news largely false part service in many cases willing parties to manipulate the electorate exaggerating the crimes of the opposition while hiding their own. But the greatest deception is the claim that we live in a democracy when it is nothing more than a nest of vipers vying for control over public budgets.

They are also despicable these materialistic scientists who deny the existence of anything that cannot measure or weigh, because in his supreme arrogance science possessively arise, like a property, they do not accept that the world might be happening events beyond its control.




There are two kinds of poverty in the world, one is caused by the lack of the necessary means for a decent life and another is the consequence of the lack of dignity, one requires financial resources to resolve and the other requires a sensible behavior.

It is common among the rich mock the poor stating that poverty is always their fault and that such a situation can never happen to them, but this claim besides being selfish is deeply hypocritical, because it can be fortunate economically without But being poor in dignity.

Those politicians who pretend to say that all offenders are equal are also negligible, it is not the same one who breaks the law of necessity that the psychopath who commits his crimes by arrogance and evil. But these rascals political friends of offenders set ridiculous caps on convictions regardless of the seriousness of the crimes in order to get them acquitted as soon as possible, in the case of detention, but they have no qualms about allowing with these absurd laws also remain in freedom murderers sentenced to thousands of years after completing an insignificant part of their sentences without having repented. These scoundrels politicians of these false democracies would have us believe that they are generous when in fact what they do is betray society with the sole purpose of enriching themselves, citizens should realize that genuine democracy will only exist when laws can be chosen directly, rather than cede power to those impostors who call themselves Democrats.




From the moment the Catholic Church grew worried about giving an image of Jesus too deified with frivolous intention to avoid any questioning of his ideas or his person, or rather of the ideas that the church determined that it had to be attributed Jesus, this is because it is intended to have absolute control over citizens and for that the best way was to elevate it to the unlimited and so go up herself, as the self-proclaimed successor he intended considered the right to decide about the divine and on the human, denying citizens full freedom of thought. It is therefore necessary to fairly and impartially analyze the personality of Jesus out of dogmatism and ideas imposed.

First let me say that it is no disgrace for a man to recognize in him virtues and flaws and wrongs nor is it a mistake to think that Jesus could have. Jesus was primarily a philosopher and ideologist and only for it and deserves respect because its way attempt to contribute to the moral progress of society, is more or less his success.

Some say that Jesus belonged to the sect of the Essenes, or that Christianity is an evolution of Zoroastrianism, there is also those who say that Jesus related the loss of moral values with Roman rule, and therefore considered that the return to a more moral life would bring them freedom. Such hypotheses are possible, but keep in mind that the progress of religions is the result of adding ideas, which is nothing unworthy, Jesus as the rest of men may have their successes but also have the right to be wrong, but undoubtedly his greatest legacy was to instill in citizens that progress is not only achieved through technological development, it is also necessary moral development, and all evolved and civilized society needs a code of conduct robust to possible coexistence and progress.

In my opinion Jesus did in this regard a successful appeal in defense of peace and justice as essential to seek the welfare of humanity beginning. To understand Jesus is necessary to recognize that no miracles, for his only miracle was getting his teachings reach all corners of the earth, to try to make the world had a greater moral training.

As for the hypothesis of whether Jesus could be driven higher or extraterrestrial beings, such a thing does not seem impossible, given the vast number of planets and stars that populate our galaxy, but I think to be serious indirectly, for in my opinion any higher than our civilization considered an essential rule of conduct be willing to help a primitive world, but without this aid constitutes direct interference in the development of its history. So although this moral aid was produced it is reasonable to think that the content of religious books like the Bible was mostly the product of human beings and not superior beings, as some would have us believe.

I also look vulgar who speculate about whether Jesus had children or not, reviewing if they have some kind of inheritance law on an alleged kingdom that never existed, because we must not forget that Jesus was primarily a philosopher or prophet but not a king and whether he had children and if not ridiculous to speculate on the fact that they had some sort of right about his legacy.

It is no disgrace to recognize Jesus as the rest of the people committed successes and failures, but it is also fair to acknowledge that it was an exceptional man, because throughout history there have been many who have contributed to the progress of mankind, whether in the philosophical field and technical and that does not mean they are considered as divine beings, an evolved thought is that it sees as divine only to good ideas but not people, because they can make mistakes, you divine therefore they are true those ideas that are in line with the laws governing the cosmos. Jesus was a man who fought for delving into the consciousness of society to improve it, try to spread the doctrine of good and discover the spiritual to the world values, that in itself is already something great without having to resort to elevate him, by so it is only right to recognize the contribution of Jesus to the progress of ideas, but without obsessing about his divine or human nature.

After his death many of the things said about were inventions, as even his exact date of birth was known, partly with the well-intentioned favor the expansion of the doctrines he had taught and purpose for which he had given his life, but also in order to use it as a tool for power with illegal and selfish ends, as happened later with the Catholic church, for it is wrong they blame Jesus for the acts of those who call themselves successors of him , the right thing is to judge each by their own actions.

On the subject of miracles I do not think those attributed to Jesus are true, but we must not forget that we live in a miraculous world, because from a certain point of view the fact that the sun rises every day also has some it, or the discovery of aviation sure who saw flying for the first time an object built by man would say it's a miracle, or the arrival of the first man on the moon, we live in a universe that makes miracles, if such we mean something surprising facts that appear to violate the laws of nature known so far. However it is also fair to say that almost everything that relates to the alleged miracles performed by Jesus or that said occurred during his life can be seen as mere inventions, really Christianity was not a major religion until several centuries after his death and because of the low accuracy of the information they had on their lives and the vested interests around virtually all of it is, stories and invented those relating to the way Jesus was born, the star of Bethlehem, the magi , all simply had intended on one hand promote the expansion of their ideas, but also serve as an instrument to impose hegemonic power by the Catholic church. But most vile part of this was to equate Jesus with God, all with the sole intention to equate itself with him, declared infallible, and bring the world to the vilest religious dictatorship; this is somewhat what happened during the Middle Ages.

An evolved man should value things by their sense and not for the miracles that will be associated. The fact that Jesus did not do miracles does not mean that it was not right in his ideas. I think therefore it is fair to recognize the value of Jesus as a precursor of human progress, but it is also correct to recognize in him a man who like others had their successes but also their mistakes. Divine so are those things that are well done and consistent with universal laws, it is true that those who discover these truths do something big, but that does not mean that their ideas cannot be improved.

The truth is that reliable data we have today about Jesus are very few so any hypothesis about it can be considered definitive, so the desire of the Catholic Church to bridge the discussion of how Jesus was or how was your life, it remains questionable.

One possible explanation of why Jesus began to preach could be the fact that somehow belonged or saw influenced by the ideas of the Essenes, why those who claim that Jesus was a Jew more would be mistaken, given that those same times today religions had many different variations and perhaps Jesus tried to present their own ideas. Another issue that could support this hypothesis is the belief that Jesus spent some time in the desert, as the Essenes were also alienated from society for some years. Also among the Essenes was common to teach the use of medicinal plants for healing purposes, this possibility of healing through plants could be confused or give rise to the myth of their ability to perform miracles. As for the hypothesis of whether Jesus had long hair when it was common wear short, an explanation could be the fact that among the Hebrews was an unequivocal way of knowing when someone was trying to convey their religious dedication and was by called separation which consisted among other things left long hair, so when Jesus made the decision to start preaching might decide to wear long hair even without being a Nazarite, as a way to let people know nothing else to see what was the matter of his preaching. What seems pretty clear is that the apostles made the decision to exaggerate the facts of the life of Jesus to see that the simple predicament was not enough to spread their message, from a certain point of view can be called lying, but maybe for them it was the only way to extract a profit to the sacrifice made by his teacher. It is therefore a mistake to stop and think about whether Jesus was divine or human, because it is no disgrace for a man to recognize that it is, many men have done great things in history without it being necessary to attribute the adjective divine, divine why you should be considered only true ideas, not people, much as the church tries to make us believe otherwise, in order to limit our ability to reason. An evolutionary thought is that which comes to assessing the facts and ideas freely and therefore accepts what he considers true and reject what is considered wrong, without accepting any limitations to discuss anything, because in order to evolve is essential to be willing to accept when an idea is wrong or outdated, and from that point to improve it, it is a grave error mystify the religious characters, because they are the more mythologize further away who does it in a rational and scientific thought and that it is precisely what they want those who use the myth in order to hinder the free will of society.




The world of the future will need a new religion based on truth and freedom of thought and not the dogma imposed by religious organizations, a religion that combines philosophy and science, with justice and coexistence as its fundamental principles, religion can be static, it must evolve as the other sciences, elevate religious characters is just an obstacle to progress, it is necessary that everyone can participate in its development for the sake of humanity. Throughout history religious organizations have been limited to use these characters with the sole purpose of obtaining power and money, and no one question his ideas imposed on citizens the belief that religion is something immutable and its founders infallible, such claims also false constituted a serious attack on freedom of thought because they did not hesitate to hunt down and kill those who disagreed with them, such behavior was not only an act against human rights, but it was just the opposite what many of them preach, that is an evil act more in line with Satan that Christian philosophy. Only those religious leaders use religion for their own benefit forgetting why it was created, why it is wrong to blame the precursors of religions of the crimes of those who claim to represent them, as they are impostors. It is fair to give credit to religious figures like Jesus or Buddha, because they made a great effort in the defense of peace and coexistence, as well as contributing to the progress of humanity in the field of philosophy, but it is also fair to recognize that were men like others, exceptional for their intelligence certainly have intuition, but not divine, for divine are only those things that are in line with certain universal truths, however people can make mistakes. But religious organizations only seek power and therefore go up to boundlessness these characters in order to exalt themselves have imposed the world a religious dictatorship that hypocrisy is calling itself infallible, as does the Pope of Rome, the essence of Christianity is looking good and not power as they do, the ideal religion is one that is not dependent on any religious organization, but is organized by the state and parents' associations in schools, it is also important to remember that fact that religious organizations have decried religion does not mean that it has no sense, because it is rather the opposite, it is not possible to create a world it evolved if at the same time is not deeply moral. To my understanding the religion of the future will be that collect the successes of all religions, such as the defense of humanism and eternal life advocated in Christianity or the existence of reincarnation proposed in Buddhism, mental dictatorship that seeks impose religious dogma is only an obstacle to the progress of philosophy and why such organizations should disappear, the world needs is a religion not a religious organization, the aim of these is to get the power competing with governments. The world of the future will be no different to have a higher technological level; either by having more energy will be different by having a strong code of values that consider truth and justice as its fundamental principles.




In my opinion one of the characteristics of the man of the future will be its ability to doubt everything, because only through the ability to doubt progress is possible, I intend to say by this that in the universe there are no absolute truths, but the question is man in his limited possibilities is very difficult to be sure what those truths are, they can be expected, but eventually some of those convictions are modified in whole or in part by new scientific discoveries. But especially in a society where lying is part of a so steadily and today is mostly necessary to doubt everything, because with so many politicians and media using lies or half-truths to get control over citizens is essential to maintain doubts about everything they tell us. It is good to have principles and convictions, but also need not obsess with them and accept that you can be wrong, without this course is very difficult to be prepared to adapt to progress.

Doubt must be above any myth belief or religion it is common to find who claims to have absolute reason based on being their based on written thoughts made in the past for alleged divine beings, but how do we know that such writings belong truly a superior being? And how do we know that even if true this statement writings have not been modified or misunderstanding by the person who wrote it? Only a fool waived his right to doubt and folds to the interpretations of others without further analysis of things, because very divine that we find the ideas written in religious books that is no reason to give up our own judgment and our ability to doubt, especially when the amount of interest created by many imposters who intermediaries between God and men believe is evident. Not that there are no absolute truths how hard is knowing what, so the question has to be an essential tool in any developed society. Religious leaders resort to the argument of faith in order to control the minds of his followers, but this is nothing more than a mental maneuver to deprive the right to think freely, faith must never be an argument for losing freedom of thought in favor of those impostors.

Another example of how the question is being replaced by dogma are destructive cults, one of its main features is the arrogance with which raised its postulates, i.e. for its adherents their beliefs are considered certain facts while beliefs the others are treated as mere hypotheses, all because they intend to use their supposed knowledge as a kind of a weapon with which to be above others, i.e. knowledge as an instrument of power arise, which they hope others submit to their claims, as if knowledge outside their property, rather than simply something enriching, this is certainly one of the most vile ways in which you can raise the acquisition of knowledge, deny to himself doubt that they require others because they are imbued with vanity. The truth is that these impostors religion do not care and only used it in order to gain power.

Only doubt allows us to be mentally free, therefore those who would have us believe that their beliefs are true without any room for doubt, what they show is their own mediocrity and give us a clear reason to distance ourselves from them.




Actually every man is part of God, every man has a creative capacity and every man has eternal life, yet over cosmic life we must live many lives where it is necessary to forget to be able to regenerate.

It is therefore necessary that every man develop his creative ability beginning to doubt false truths greedy trying to impose. Because in reality God is nothing but the sum of all beings in the universe and the natural laws that govern, laws emanating from the universal truths that are out of time and that form the essence of the universe. The process of evolution of living beings leads indissolubly to understand this truth and from that moment he begins to doubt the lies around you and then your soul is free for the first time, because only when you understand that we are all part of God really begins to understand that our future depends on our own efforts and only then man is able to get rid of these parasites that rob us of our mental freedom proclaiming himself God's spokesmen. It is therefore necessary to develop that inner sun, the capacity of initiative and seek the truth for yourself, since then the man will be free and the world will have peace.




It is surprising to see so many scientists claiming find intelligent life in space and discover that they are the same scientists who deny that life may already be present on earth. Do you not understand that our planet certainly must take many centuries being visited by extraterrestrial civilizations? Especially if we consider that our galaxy has existed for fifteen billion years ago. It is true that the distances between stars are great, but it is also true that these extraterrestrial civilizations have had millions of years of time to reach us by creating colonies in space between their home planet and ours. But materialistic people always denied such a possibility, because they are not willing to accept anything they cannot understand or control. The world has achieved great development in technological terms, but it remains to achieve the same level on the moral plane. I believe these higher beings have been carrying out work to guide us and this final contact will not occur until the world reaches its same intellectual level and stop considering the aliens as some ugly, stupid or evil beings, but with a technological level, because whoever thinks so what it does is act arrogantly refusing to accept that these things can be better than them. It is necessary that the world is made a self-criticism and overcomes prejudice and ignorance that prevents him from becoming part of the evolved worlds of space.

But it is even more regrettable to see how governments of the earth strive to hide who are unable to stop these flying saucers that fly over every day their skies with impunity without being able to do anything about it. I also find it surprising that someone might believe that these governments possess these dishes damaged or its crew. But how can anyone believe that beings with a level ahead of us a million years allow this possible? Unless they do so deliberately, which seems highly unlikely, in my opinion who they claim that they are just charlatans desire to create sensational stories that make money. But governments are not interested deny land, as well as their prestige increases and serves to gain time while finding a way to stop them. Meanwhile our elder brothers continue flying over our skies with bright ships intentional in order to see them and become familiar with them until the time of the final contact possible.




In this book I have tried to deepen and broaden the ideas in the whole of my previous books. The reader may consider that sometimes have repeated the same themes, but the reason is the importance for me is to emphasize those things that I consider essential. All these books are designed solely to contribute to the progress of humanity through its own self, i.e. the progress of their own conscience and reasoning ability. It is true that my books are generally brief, but it could be said that each of them represents only a chapter in a ledger formed by the sum of them all, because in reality all are interrelated. The reader will see that my books do not conform to current taboos, but that's because my mind is free and these books have not been done in order to earn money or receive prizes unlike many writers of classical literature but they have been made only to tell the truth. There will also be those who think that my books have impeccable writing of others, but for me writing is not a profession and I think the important thing is the content that is transmitted and not the external setting in which arises. Sometimes it is necessary that we stop to observe the world in perspective, maybe then we have the ability to see reality more clearly and can correct those things that are wrong.



Nov. 12, 2018, 7:34 p.m. 0 Report Embed 0
The End

Meet the author

Antonio Pinto Renedo Mi mayor ilusión es descubrir aquello que los libros no cuentan.

Comment something

No comments yet. Be the first to say something!