My philosophical ideas Follow story

antonio Antonio Pinto Renedo

This book represents a journey through the world through meditation.

Inspirational All public.

#meditation #philosophy
reading time
AA Share



Antonio Pinto Renedo


© Author, layout and cover design:

Antonio Pinto Renedo


Published in December 2014





Exercise and diet

The extermination of the Healers

The process of infatuation

Progress is in the balance

Infections have inflammations


Drug hypocrites

Change station

The importance of a stable schedule

Instability of success

Human plague



Esparta a land of slaves

Athenian democracy

Immoral state

Fraud of the economic crisis

False integration

The misery of nationalism

The strength of a government

A perfect world



The colors of the numbers

The end of the solar system

The nature of time

The beginning and end of the cosmos

The origin of the man



The road to the light

The dilemma of the prophets

False prophets

Destructive cults

The haunted houses


The true Messiah

The inner journey

The real virtues

A world of lies

The true way




The main reason for writing this book is to try to deepen the ideas expressed in my previous books, for any clarification is always good. It is also raised as individual items because at first these items were displayed through my blog on the internet. To make them more understandable, I decided my articles grouped into four main groups according to their content: medicine, politics, science and philosophy.

This book has been translated from the original version in Spanish.


Chapter 1- MEDICINE


Exercise and diet


Today it is many people who use exercise to control weight, and it is true that exercise, by causing calorie intake, can serve as a control method, however it is a mistake to believe that exercise should be the essential to that end method, it is at the root where you must attack the problem of overweight, that is not about spending a lot of energy in order to eliminate the calories before been ingested, but take from the beginning of calories your body really needs, so who wants to lose weight, you should consider one suitable method food, for which only the calories that should be consumed, whether the gym is included or not. It is true that exercise is helpful in maintaining good health because the human body is, in a way, a machine made to work, but it is also true that they are wrong who think that exercise is essential for weight loss, in fact may be considered even as a little ecological act be for hours in a gym machine in order to lose calories, because it is an unnecessarily wasted energy, much better would not have taken those calories initially which then need to be removed. So the key is to tackle the problem from the beginning using an essentially vegetable low calorie diet, which also fills easily, and trying to eat only in the hours set for it, making a maximum of four meals a day and between meals only consume water, besides being good for the diet is also good for your teeth.




Rarely in history has there been so much difference between appearances and reality as persecution by the Catholic Church against healers who used the knowledge acquired over thousands of years about the healing power of plants. Inquisition originally created to discover just degenerating false Christians to be an instrument of persecution and extermination of anyone who dissented from the church simply postulates. Thus he began the persecution during the average age of these naturalists doctors who were healers, such was the envy that the church had them not hesitate to condemn them to death because they had committed the crime of offering society she could not, i.e. healing their diseases, such was his crime did not hesitate to chase to near complete extinction, many died and with them the knowledge of medicine on natural remedies accumulated over hundreds of generations and passed down from father to son took the good of humanity. In addition the church was pursuing another sinister purpose, to seize the lands of those who had been accused of witchcraft shamelessly, these events are proof that it is not the same religion that church, because the first is a philosophy and a way of thinking and the second is an organization created to use religion as an instrument to gain power, by which they believe in the right to say according to their whim what the will of God, but solely for their own profit that is with the sole purpose of serving Satan. Eventually society understand that it is not the same as saying it is just to be fair, to say that God is represented to represent God, because there is no more appropriate place for evil to develop to the place where naively I suppose not, i.e. religious organizations, eventually understand that man does not need intermediaries to tell you what the will of God and learn to seek truth itself. Persecution carried out mainly by the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages against these naturalists medical deprived Europe of knowledge acquired by them for thousands of years, this situation was only possible treatment of medicine we might call chemistry, but this based medicine in laboratory experiments it was at a stage of embryonic development, so you could say that the West again not have some medical treatments similar quality loss until the mid-twentieth century. Only history will tell how many victims were both direct and indirect of this senseless persecution.




Throughout life most people go through at some point in the situation of being in love, such a situation can be an extraordinary experience if that feeling is reciprocated or be an ordeal if it is not to the point of reaching cause of suicide in some cases. But how many people have wondered what the processes occurring in our brain in such a situation? In my opinion it would be necessary to go back in time to the origins of the human species itself, a time to get anything was always difficult, for this reason the design nature, in order to ensure the survival of the species the process called infatuation.

Arguably, in the brain there is an automatic mechanism whereby when a person believes he is at his ideal partner and thinks that such a union is acceptable or possible then kicks in the process of falling in love, in this situation the person is trapped in a kind of psychological cage by which the brain disrupts the natural process of stimulation so that the person receives only such natural stimuli when their actions or thoughts are directed to carry out their union with the desired partner, so that anything that disrupts this desire results in suppression of these stimuli and causes therefore great discomfort, because in this situation only wants to get rid of the strong feeling of emptiness and see only solution to this being with the desired person, so these do not understand that it is only a brain mechanism designed by nature in order to facilitate the reproduction process of the species and the love person is able to overcome any obstacles get in their way to achieve their goal.

Does this mean that falling in love is bad? Not necessarily, because among other things the infatuation causes the desire to be with the desired person is so intense that the degree of conviction to be with her and be faithful is so strong that it is appropriate when it comes to performing a task common as important as creating a family and taking it forward, i.e. the person in a state of infatuation is convinced with great decision to go all the way with your partner and when that feeling of infatuation disappears however is the memory of what he felt and what one was willing to take in case of being reciprocated, it's as if nature wants us and make us take responsibility before the importance of the relationship you want to have. Perhaps the trouble with falling in love is that defects of the desired but only their virtues person cannot see in that mental state and imagines that person is not as it is but as I would like it, however the process of infatuation is only active when the number of qualities that are appreciated in the desired person are high enough to make possible its inception therefore cannot be considered completely wrong. It can be said then that the purpose of infatuation is on one hand overcome the obstacles that hinder the union of the couple, and the other to convince each other of what you are willing to give and receive, and thus the union is stronger and expectations for the future are greater if there is infatuation compared to if there is not, but we must also recognize failing in that state things look better than they are but can be said that nature does with a good purpose is to strengthen the conviction of the spouses in the future of their relationship.

Can we then say that falling in love is a state induced by our own mind regardless of our will? The answer is no, since infatuation only acts as a support mechanism when the person has already decided he wants the desired person.




Arguably, from a point of view metaphysical the solution to most problems is the middle path that is more moderate, however that does not mean that this is due to consider that extreme measures also have their raison d'être because when something leaves his place of balance either by negligence or accident it is necessary to return to your site and for this the only solution may be a forceful action to restore the situation to its rightful place that is your right place. This does not mean they cannot be exceptions to this law of universal balance, since accepting exceptions would also be a form of moderation, but would be out of this law those behaviors that being wrong would be objectionable completely and without exception, because only you have to understand as part of the dynamics of balance and moderation that which are in order with nature and is socially useful. An example of those things that would be objectionable completely would in my view the use of stimulant drugs such as snuff and alcohol, unfair behavior or uncivil, and anything else that would be quite reprehensible for being wrong in these cases You could not use the argument moderate use of them for being clear their danger to society. From a symbolically intermediate balance point would be represented as appropriate by the number three representing life and represented by the color green and is in the middle between the red color represents the energy and matter, and the blue color represents the spirit and the union of these two colors in their midpoint leads to life represented by green, for life arises intermediate balance between red and blue. Also the number five represents this balance as it is at the midpoint between the number one and ten. In the universe many cases in which the need for an intermediate balance is observed for example if the temperature in the living areas, are given as the right would get the intermediate between very cold and very warm i.e. ideal for health, which could be between about fifteen or twenty degrees Celsius, but are countless cases where it can be seen as the solution is the middle way of various options.

Another example is the current political models, because as a way to participate parties tend to represent only one point of partial commonly defined as left or right, you try to convince citizens that the truth belongs to them exclusively and all error is on the contrary, but this is just a false representation of reality induced by unnecessary division matches between left and right that the current model causes, this division has nothing to do with the truth as this is neutral and is divided equally among the various political forces, the ideal political system would be one in which the power was not held by the parties but each and every one of the laws were decided separately by citizens form because current division of ideas in left and right is simply a way to distract citizens are denied while the real democracy.

It is clear therefore that in the cosmos the solution in most situations is the middle way, but only when it comes to reasonable questions, for all the wrong behaviors would be objectionable and therefore would make no sense trying to justify looking at them exceptional use, the theory concerning moderation and exceptional use it makes sense to apply only to those things that have meaning.




Sometimes due to prolonged exposure of the body at a lower temperature required, called rheumatism occur, I do not mean by this that this is the only possible cause but probably one of the most frequent. Because of these low temperatures the capillaries are compressed by reducing the blood supply to tissues and then the bones receive a lower amount of blood supply to the necessary, then nature in its great wisdom triggers inflammation of the tissues surrounding the bones resulting in rheumatic pains. That inflammation is intended to increase the diameter of the veins and capillaries and recover the amount of blood needed for proper maintenance of the body. But today, doctors, in their ignorance of nature, always tend to seek a solution to the health problems through the use of coercive chemicals to the human body, i.e. the so-called anti-inflammatories, because if they devote themselves to understand the body would realize that often inflammatory processes which seek to facilitate blood flow and possible arrival of nutrients to the tissues, but with the use of anti-inflammatory that is produced is the opposite effect and consequently on the one hand not the problem that caused inflammation is fixed and the other with these drugs can cause new health problems, the solution therefore in these cases is to regulate the inflammation that is not excessive but avoid is the best treatment for these rheumatic inflammatory processes is combating cold that caused the inflammatory reaction by using more warm clothes, once recovered the body has the nutrients it lacked inflammation cease on their own. In those cases where inflammation is caused by the thinning of the bones the solution would avoid overdo efforts and always perform moderate exercise.

Another example of inflammation is of infectious processes, in this case causing inflammation is the body's attempt to combat the spread of a virus by the inflammatory process, i.e. inflammation usually has two components, on the one hand increases section of the veins and capillaries and other body temperature is increased thereby increasing the flow of blood and thereby facilitating the arrival of the antibody to the infected area. It is true that sometimes an excess of body temperature can be counterproductive but when it comes to a slight excess is preferable to let nature take its way and facilitate the arrival of more blood and therefore more antibodies to the infected area, so both the use of anti-inflammatories can be considered correct only when the fever or inflammation is exaggerated, but not before is because what would camouflage the disease but cannot cure.




It is regrettable to see today so many people paraded through the medical clinics seeking the miracle formula to cure their ailments, they are not able to understand that diseases have an intimate relationship of cause and effect with the actions that everyone does throughout of their life. Man has to understand that much of the things that happen are we responsible for our own actions and therefore can be corrected in the same way, because most diseases are the result of lifestyle habits detrimental to health and it is therefore in those habits of wrong where you have to act conduct, however even despite the large current technological development physicians continue to have too easily prescribe chemicals to cover up complaints substances whose solution would have been simple, simply enough with the patient listen a little closer to your body and leave those bad habits that hurt him, but instead these doctors simply prescribe chemicals that not only do not solve the problem but create new diseases, it is absurd to believe that you can settle a disease without removing the cause that produces it. The man of the future will understand that many of the things that happen in your life do not just happen, understand that he can and should be creative part of their own future and consequently must also assume their own responsibility for their own actions and so in diseases that could suffer. It is true that we cannot determine all the events that happen in our lives, but most of them do; especially those affecting our private lives, so it is necessary to understand that we all have a certain creative abilities within us that allow us shape our environment and adapt it to our preferences. It is true that there are diseases whose cure depend exclusively on health care, but it is also true that the vast majority of ailments and diseases do not require chemistry-based solutions and have easy solution to understand that these ailments are the consequences of wrong actions and therefore it is in correcting those acts where healing is. Today one of the main causes of disease in developed countries is the excessive intake of calories, which is reaching a level almost epidemic, however patients stubbornly refuse to understand that a profound change is needed in habits of life favoring more moderate exercise and a mainly plant food, but those patients go to doctors looking for the miraculous formula that take away disease but without giving up the causes that produce them, this is an example of genuine intellectual clumsiness, but also medical malpractice, because in many cases limited to dispensing drugs without stress enough inform their patients that is not the solution, only time will tell how many victims have caused some medical practices that extol the value of medicines but forgetting importance of a healthy lifestyle.




It is paradoxical to see how today there are many voices calling for tougher penalties for use or trafficking of drugs or at least maintain existing ones, and it is paradoxical that the very ones who cry out against counter drugs are simultaneously calls guzzlers legal drugs, alcohol and snuff, and even more paradoxical that these same individuals who oppose furiously when someone proposes the same restrictions on legal drugs than for others. Could it be that they think they are consuming other drugs but what they do not consume? That is an exercise of supreme hypocrisy because drugs called legal cause more deaths each year than all the others put together. Not to mention the legal advantages in many countries are granted for criminals commit their crimes while intoxicated. I think my understanding is not in the legal field where it belongs combat trafficking or drug use but in the moral field, because the fact that it can be right to allow free consumption and sale of drugs, as is the case with alcohol and snuff, it does not mean it is correct from a moral point of view. Drugs are objectionable for its high toxicity, its ability to disrupt the mind, and lose the reason in addition to causing a false stimulus, but it is through social awareness and rejection of the state to grant extenuating as to combat and not by the police chase, this form of combat drugs already demonstrated their failure during Prohibition in the United States in the early twentieth century, and governments today are spending millions in police chase with the same useless results, do not realize those who keep the business running are the same consumers who refuse to accept anyone tell you by force what they should eat and what not, is by respecting their free will and trying to convince with arguments and not violently how citizens finally understand the foolishness of drug use and that is when the fight can be won.




Arguably, from a biological point of view there are two seasons alone, the summer season and winter season since the biological system of our body is to these two stations that adapts and is in the remaining two seasons spring and autumn in which it does, so they say that spring the blood alters, just then between May and June metabolism has to change and adapt to circumstances summer, then it is often fever, irritability occurs, pains in different parts of the body and insomnia, the cause of this is in my opinion the fact that the heat favors the increase of virus activity in our body, which results in the immune system is forced to provide greater number of antibodies to blood flow during winter viruses are generally more dormant because of the cold since low temperatures are medium disinfects you naturally also helps to fight fevers, but in the spring this changes, the increase in temperature leads to increased viral growth, in the air and in our body, and then the immune system is overset suddenly, then it occurs a hasty struggle between this and viruses with known symptoms that ended with the victory of our metabolism once antivirals means are increased and adapted to the new situation, for it while symptoms are mild, it is preferable not to use drugs, to give the possibility to our body to seek its adaptation. In the fall reverse this situation occurs because the drop in temperature produces a relaxing effect thereby increasing the feeling of sleep. Actually viruses have been created by nature in order to decompose dead organic matter into its elementary molecules, however when accidentally introduced into a living body called infections occur and that is when the immune system comes into action to restore the status quo, however when dealing with an unknown virus may be the case of known epidemics, this happens because the immune system known natural for healing remedy, but most times throughout history has been the man himself responsible for epidemics and not viruses because their inability to control their own population growth, led to often, the number of inhabitants was more than enough food to keep them, causing a weakening of the immune system, this being a perfect medium for the spread of disease Therefore, in this case, the virus met the uncomfortable task of causing a correction in the number of inhabitants, that man himself was not able to do, which of course would not hesitate to blame God.




Today it is common that in the course of our lives, even during the time that lasts a week, is frequently changing schedules dedicated to sleep, very often, but it is important to note that living life with stability is very important to be healthy. Actually Ideally hours when you sleep were the same and the same hours on weekdays and holidays, i.e. the same schedule would remain about bedtime and duration regardless of whether it is a free or holiday, the human body has an internal memory and try to adapt to the ways we mark him but the more stable the hours of wakefulness and sleep most favored is our health, therefore the widespread custom to rise early an extreme form of working days and then staying up late just as the holidays only leads to chaos in the internal order of our body. It is also important to say that the recommended hours of sleep in an adult range between seven and eight hours a day, not being advisable to reduce this amount by the damage this may cause to our brain because this amount of hours you need to break process and internal recycling. Desirable therefore would try as far as possible always sleep this many hours every day regardless of whether it is business or holiday and try the schedule chosen this differ as little as possible from a few days to others, future laws will surely try to guide companies towards the use of working time arrangements that best fit an ideal schedule, so that the same day whether it's working or not being used. An ideal schedule could be getting up at eight o'clock and go to bed at twelve o'clock for example, and this time it would always be used regardless of day it is, thus not being necessary to change the schedule for work quality of life would be much better, this ideal schedule would use as a reference, an approximate time that dawns the shortest day in winter to choose when to get up, in order to ensure light as long as possible, and would be used continuously throughout the year. Also I consider preferable sleeping hours once not make naps since naps are used only to prolong the night but they are not required except for children, plus seven or eight hours that our bodies need every day are not so many that divide is also necessary it is logical to sleep at night which is when there are no light, daytime sleep is a way to waste it. It would also be good to divide the day into three equal parts, one for work, one for leisure, and one for sleeping, because free time is not only necessary on holidays, weekdays must also have their share. Another custom that I consider wrong is to intersperse holidays between weekdays, since alternations between work and rest should follow a steady pace for the benefit of our health, and such interference all they do is disrupt the rhythm of work causing loss of concentration, it is not a question of reducing days off but group them together, so that the perfect week would consist of five working days and a maximum of two holidays, so if for some reason were needed more days off these are made taking as free all week, i.e. the number of suitable free days each week would be approximately twenty percent of the total and 15 to 30 vacation days a year. Therefore the festive activities should always be made within days off set for it.




Arguably, from an energy point of view success would be located in the high but unstable level, and failure at the lowest but stable energy level, since the success is often fifty percent own successes but other fifty percent to the favorable chance. That is that success does not depend only on what we do consciously and our own merits, but also depends on those things we do not know but who happened to favor us. See but the history of Rome, was great in many ways by their successes in making political decisions, but nevertheless when bigger was its expansion when it harder looked like it might fall, but its empire disappeared, this proves that the ability we understand the world around us is only partial and that great world we still have to understand we can play tricks especially when someone thinks that success belongs individually. Another big failure usually happens when successful, is the fact guard down and underestimate the risks, thinking that the fall is impossible and that is something to others, this often leads to mistakes and that is when it is understood that success is not something that depends only on our successes, because things that affect us and we do not understand are more than we think, so we have to rejoice success but without losing humility that makes us wise.




Too often we hear news about how they could cultivate more land to feed more and more millions of people, but someone has stopped a moment to think that one of the main problems of this planet is the excessive expansion of the human population. Throughout history excess population (i.e. when the population exceeds food resources to sustain) they were resolved by nature in the form of an epidemic caused by the virulence of disease applied to a population weakened by hunger, soon citizens rushed to accuse God of his misfortunes, but how many people recognize the origin of the epidemic in their lack of self-control in human reproduction methods? Today it is very common to hear that if certain forests are cleared or if economic or farming methods are changed may keep more people but And who remembers the rights of animals and plants is that they do not have right to life? Every day for continuous human expansion species disappear, but few remember their right to have a recognized territory, it is true that a person's life is worth more than an animal, but it is also true that the survival of a species worth more than a human life. Nor is seriously ask developed countries remain underdeveloped because it is right that all people be able to feed themselves without having to rely on anyone. It is therefore inevitable that the world's sooner or later take the decision to implement birth control policies that determine a fixed number of inhabitants for each country and each continent in terms of resources that are able to produce themselves.


Chapter 2 - POLICY




Often we talk about the greatness and misery of Sparta. And certainly as every nation in the process of evolution had good and bad. During that time about 600 BC., all Greece was a melting pot of ideas, and Athens was in a great process of development in the field of philosophy but was also taking its first steps in a model of emerging democracy, under pressure from the increasingly important community of artisans and sea traders, were fighting for their political rights recognized to the classical landed aristocracy. Instead Sparta was geared more towards the development of a more internal cohesion oriented social system and its military strength. The greatness of Sparta was that could appreciate their society as a united whole understanding that for a society to be strong there must be a certain homogeneity either racial or appearance in the existence of laws that provide social guarantees but also require their citizens to fulfill them. But the misery of Sparta consisted of his obsession reduced to a very small citizens with equal rights minority, therefore he condemned his own self-destruction, then did not understand that integrate the conquered territories to their state was more socially beneficial and militarily to use a slave model for society, we must bear in mind that the inhabitants of these territories the end of the dig were all the same way to them in appearance therefore were perfectly integrated without having had to give no discrepancies for its racial aspect. Why Sparta had many difficulties for military expansion because unlike Rome only understood by implementing a Spartan minority in the territories they conquered, which resulted in a weak political system with a very small ruling minority that easily could be overthrown. Rome also used a slaver social model, but the conquered territories considered as equal to the rest, which favored their integration into the empire. But slavery in Sparta did not include only the most disadvantaged citizens because in a sense they were slaves, according to the standards set by the legislator Lycurgus and managed by ephors every citizen of Sparta had the sole destination being part of a professional army throughout his life, and for that they were forced to join with just seven years, even the King had to undergo strict laws forcing them to live in near poverty and always make your meals in public, this was intended to ensure been obsessed military to paranoia, to the possible dissent of a population overwhelmingly excluded from political and social rights. But Sparta was an example of that when there is a project promoted by all, it is possible that few much get and his army became the most feared of his time and not be the largest but by being based on the idea that the most important thing is the union of all its members on an idea and common race. The conclusion is that unity is strength, but arbitrary and unsubstantiated some citizens in equal essence destroy exclusion. In any case I want to emphasize that from my point of view any form of direct or indirect slavery is entirely reprehensible whether people of the same culture or race or not done.




Few political models have been cited in the past and the present as the Athenian democratic model emerged in the classical period from 508 BC, but rarely has emphasized the fact that this model of democracy did not emerge as a moral initiative to promote the sharing of power and politics closer to citizens. The truth is that Athenian democracy was the result of displacement of the sources of wealth of classical landed aristocracy to new forms of industry represented mainly by the powerful naval fleet of Athens. In ancient times the power was always associated indissolubly to land ownership, but the gradual emergence and development of various crafts such as pottery metallurgy or naval sector were causing gradually social unrest that demanded more share power decision-making bodies that were previously reserved for the landed aristocracy, is in this context of things like Athenian democracy emerged from there Athens did not hesitate to make propaganda of its political system placing itself as an example of struggle for fair distribution of power, however this was only mere propaganda to promote their own campaign of imperial expansion throughout the region, the truth is that Athenian democracy was more the product of struggles for power sharing among the productive sectors, a true democracy, because only represented those sectors and political rights had only a tiny part of the population n therefore to describe correctly this political system would have to say that was rather a totalitarian system but open to more sectors of the population classical feudal system. It is at this time that began to define the division of political models between left and right, while Athens represented the democratic progressivism, Sparta represented the landowner and monarchist conservatism, but this is just a simplistic way to define it, because in reality both systems politicians were actually totalitarian models that reserved the power to only a few of its citizens and Sparta, power was very divided between a militarist legal system inspired by Lycurgus and left little room for maneuver to the king, and on the other the ephors side were those who really controlled the power, the king only fulfilled the duties of head of the army but with limited political capacity, this shows that the political systems of Athens and Sparta were not as different as a superficial observation might indicate. Centuries later, the English Civil War of 1642 marked the revival in modern times of the class struggle between the landed aristocracy and the business bourgeoisie, but again the goal of these supposedly democratic struggles was not the honest desire to share power with the people but use him to overthrow the aristocracy. This is actually the political model that contemporary society has inherited, there is no denying that the process of evolution of nations toward democracy is a factor of progress, but it is also true that while democracy stop not only serve economic powers and pass to include all citizens in decision-making bodies is not can no longer be considered incomplete because a full democracy made would be one in which citizens could choose each and every one of the laws individually and not as happening now in its unique ability to participate in power is simply the ability to choose their leaders every four years, this situation does not change while democracy cannot be considered fully realized.




lamentable is the degree of degeneration that may eventually fall democracies misnamed, as they have become mere nest of thieves, but more unfortunate is that those politicians who claim to protect is more dedicated to steal than to make political profit social, truly unfortunate is that from coalescing with offenders to be all protected by law. Throughout history rulers they have always had profit as one of its main objectives but never weakness against criminals and helplessness victims have been so evident as now. The explanation is simple and is that the former rulers usually kings did not have to explain to citizens about their behavior but the misnamed democracies if, why these anti-social politicians have striven to create laws that go unpunished, but to apply to them the same law as the rest of criminals they also end up benefiting from impunity, One example is in some countries whose penal code states that even being sentences centuries criminals out with absolute ease as there is a clause limiting the permanence in prison to a maximum of fifteen years regardless of the magnitude of the crimes committed, do not pretend you say that criminals sentenced to very long sentences are not entitled to benefit from sentence reductions for good behavior, what I mean is that those possible reductions in any case have to be a pretext to get rid of the essential part of worth and therefore of life imprisonment, if need be, because when someone takes a life and does malice aforethought must give yours as payment, meaning that once proven guilty would no longer be a priority the interests that the offender may have, but just to satisfy society and the victims of damage that might have caused, it is logical that the price for taking a life is lost freewill on their own. I do not intend to defend here the death penalty because I believe that a developed society does not need it, but if the only possible choice would release criminals after serving a ridiculous part of their sentences or the death penalty would undoubtedly be preferable penalty death, because only the weak governments of false democracies arise solely in the interest of criminals and not the victims. But those governments claim that prisoners criminals have long assumed a great cost to the state, but then. Why not put them to workshops with which to work in prisons and thus pay their debts to the state and their victims? Could it be that the state has some unmentionable debt to them? But the most embarrassing thing is that in some countries have created laws by which an offender may be compensated for their victims for damages suffered during the commission of their crimes, based on the assumption that they would be treated excessive hardness. But is it not the duty of the state to prevent any inducement to commit a crime? Then it just would have been to allow the offender to report if they wanted his victim for alleged mistreatment during the commission of their crime, but in no case could be the beneficiary of any compensation, as this would contradict the state's duty to combat crime and ensure social good. But these Democrats false politicians reduce the sentences of offenders in a thousand different ways and all to benefit them to be detained, and if that were not enough invented the law of amnesty so that in the event that there was no legal way to get rid of then shame themselves, i.e. their political partners, who call themselves decent, would free them.




It is true that the economic crisis of 2008 has been a real test for both citizens and politicians since been forced to implement new methods for recovery, but has also launched a real deception social masses because what they are not told is that most of the reasons why they are asked austerity is because the current globalization of the economy means using the same rules of the game both in advanced countries and underdeveloped, i.e. attempting to convince workers that the only way for enterprises to be competitive is by reducing wages and turning workers into something like servants as in the middle Ages, and all this because it is allowing trade without barriers with countries that do not apply any standards to ensure human rights for their workers, which results in a process increasingly evident of disadvantaged in economic profitability in companies of those countries that do recognize labor rights over those without. Politicians and businessmen try to convince us that the only solution to solve the problem is to reduce workers to slaves and emerging economies but could it be that the developed countries have an obligation to trade with these countries with those rules of the game? Certainly not, then it is logical that if a globalization of economy and trade without barriers arises right would require emerging countries compliance with common rules of humane treatment of their workers. It is also true that in some developed countries have implemented policies often uncompetitive as a result of the great technological advantage they had in the past with respect to other countries, but in the current situation of economic globalization these misguided policies have been evidenced, for example early retirement too early, unemployment too high and without requiring any conditions job search in return, subsidizing university courses that are not needed, as there greatest number of applicants for those jobs available jobs, promote workers who feign low against those who are honored, not create enough oversight mechanisms and rewarding precisely those who serve less than this resource. All citizens should be guaranteed a basic unemployment allowance indefinitely, but both subsidies low for reasons not working as unemployment should be modest enough to not be a factor that discouraged in your job search. Another example of picaresque is the case subsidies to single mothers and unemployed, some countries argued that it was better to provide the money necessary before having children in orphanages, but what did not consider is that if a woman says he has no resources, you get paid you need to keep a child, this can consider this as a form of employment, requiring the state raising their future children and sometimes faking his bachelorhood and turning this situation in an authentic way social parasitism, because women can always refuse to work stating that having young children continuously it prevents thus children become hostages and source of wealth for their parents, but also a clear case of discrimination about those couples who are honest. Therefore, any social assistance should always be linked to the standing commitment by accepting the job that the state could provide and require the biological parents to assume responsibilities for their children. Economic policies should always seek equity and therefore refusing to promote what is not profitable and rewarding vagrancy, such as occurs when movies or sports that do not interest anyone promoted. Another regrettable practice that is increasingly observed in Europe is to try to dismantle the so-called welfare state is destroying all the social rights achieved since the end of World War II, and all as a result of the apparent passivity in what it refers to stopping illegal immigration, because on one side is tolerated as if it were inevitable, but at the same time trying to limit social rights for all citizens. Politicians and businessmen try to convince us that their inability to stop the immigration invasion forces them to shield social rights and reserve them only for whom they are able to pay, but the truth is that they allow that immigration in order to cause unfair competition with local workers causing the lowering of wages and thereby reduce them to a kind of slavery, but more unfortunate is that the same workers observe impassively as those illegal immigrants steal their jobs and do not have the courage to oppose it and meanwhile the wealthiest are kept in a sort of privileged ghetto. Therefore legalize these immigrants is a serious mistake because although it may be considered unfortunate situation does not stop being unfair against those who try to immigrate legally and therefore represents support for immigration mafias. On the other hand it makes no sense to consent immigration in a country where there is already a bag of large unemployed, as this results in an unnecessary confrontation between workers having more unemployed than jobs available and therefore causes evident impoverishment of the population, i.e. migration processes must always be subject to there being a job so they can be absorbed without harming the rest of the citizens in recipient countries ideally all countries implement policies birth control by their number of inhabitants always coincide with the jobs available. Therefore what is clear is that in a world that trade relations barrier arises, the priority is not that developed countries implement the business policies semi slavery used in underdeveloped countries, but require these countries that if they want to trade with they should apply common global policies that guarantee fair labor and human rights to all citizens of the planet.




After World War II the United States tried to take political advantage of his victory against the Germans, but had never been willingly for Americans interracial mixtures however because they had defeated the Nazis who opposed them now only fit the option to take political advantage of such a situation, meaning that even within its borders laws were created to allow minorities helpless yet to the outside were undertaken imperialist policies throughout the world under the consideration that since no appreciate racial differences in their own territory they did not need to consider an impediment to the invasion of another country that its inhabitants were of another race, this is a frivolous way of understanding the idea of racial equality. In addition within the United States government showed no interest in recognizing the rights of other different races of white, which led to the public denunciation of Martin Luther King, prompting laws crease in which formally they recognized the rights of such minorities but only apparent way since the end of the day the US government understands the relationship between races as something that only served from a viewpoint of submission toward each other and to make sure it denies citizens public services such as free or guaranteed health that all causes are social ghettos, while the arrival of periodically immigrants are allowed to stimulate growth in order to create hopes for improvement in the battered population and disfavored as a developed country does not need to grow essential way, what you need is a fair distribution of wealth to avoid situations of social exclusion, but with the illusion of growth it seeks to encourage the population living in semi-slavery to believe that even though they are being exploited for economic growth may soon go from being exploited to be exploiters therefore growth is a concern not of workers but of those who exploit them for fear they have of those disadvantaged people cry out to be treated as human beings, this is the reason that the use of firearms for civilians were legalized, with in order to protect targets in case of racial uprising. All this shows that the racial problem is far from resolved but hidden and only this policy apparent support miscegenation remains how to take political advantage of their victory over the Germans since it seems contradictory that had fought against them but at the same time would support their ideas, all this shows that miscegenation is just one more operating environment and that the best way to guarantee the rights of each race is that each living in different territories without mixing and property rights on its recognized and free from interference of external powers earth, an example we have with France after the second world war on the one hand spoke of equality and fraternity, and the other invaded and massacred the population of Algeria, claiming of course that only came to defend their rights. After the economic crisis of 2008 and the continued arrival flood of illegal immigrants some European governments use policies far right as the replacement of a free healthcare for other payment began to consider feasible and thus shield the indigenous population before immigration I like the fiefdoms they are unable to stop, but which have no qualms in exploiting. All this as I say shows that the best way that the rights of each race are respected is by creating a mutually recognized territories by all, in which every living race without mixing and without the imperialist experiments are allowed beyond their own racial areas, but this needs to be overcome the trauma of the second world war and understood that interracial coexistence does not involve mixing and mixture thereof, and as a result a policy banning illegal immigration applies, because the mafias that immigration are not those supplying vessels in coming, but these weak governments that legalize hurtling immigrants and preferably illegal on legal, because the best message you can launch whom trying to enter Europe illegally is that if you get it all will be advantages not to mention the perpetuation of bureaucracy for the expulsion process. All this at the end to keep the fallacy of exploiting these immigrants, but with the inevitable deterioration of the quality of life of an increasingly entrenched before the rise of miscegenation and with fewer social rights society, and all for profit companies and amid a numbed public that sees without realizing how their society is being invaded under the guise of a humanitarian issue and knowing that these immigrants, in the absence of an employment contract, is devoted in many cases steal or depend on the state, which in turn conceals the deterioration of the quality of life of an increasingly unequal in order to look more like his great American idol society, that beast out of the sea and banned slavery only to blacks could migrate to north flourishing factories so they can be exploited there. This society that observes impassive as immigrants invade our shores should remember the past, when the Vandals, about 400 AD, asked Rome to let them cross their borders for humanitarian reasons, and that after that Rome would allow them to spend were dedicated to loot the empire unashamedly. Today it is happening the same but the mental block for world war caused causes that Western society believes to be doing good when he delivers his nation hordes of immigrants who do not even bother to ask permission to enter, which vandals who invaded Rome itself did. Because the best way to guarantee equality is rejecting miscegenation and living among equals, as well it more difficult to speculators achieves their ends. Immigrants must solve their problems fighting for their rights in their own countries promoting birth control and the distribution of wealth and believe that the solution does not have to always rely on going abroad. And if anyway have to migrate is to do the right thing countries sharing the same race and culture that is as better quality of life is guaranteed.




Today are increasingly common nationalist political parties, those parties base their arguments on fomenting hatred against states as a way to get followers. Actually use the same technique as destructive cults, flatter his followers into believing that all evils come from others and that all virtues have them end up doing guilty state of everything, including his personal problems, but this it is a dangerous game because nationalism promotes the secession of territories in smaller countries thus increasing their precariousness in defending their affairs in the international arena, a test is the history of ancient Greece , failed to become this state and leave it vulnerable to subsequent invasions of Macedonians and Romans, centuries after its heyday. Currently some nationalist parties use the argument that the secession of their states can be compensated by binding to the European community, but we must not forget that this community is not a nation but a mere association of nations with little cohesion between and in any case if this accession is not a reason to sever ties with their own states. What many people do not realize is that many of those interested in these radical parties actually brings not care less values as the people, traditions and human rights and only adhere to these groups because they offer the possibility of giving rein loose his aggressiveness is what truly seek, as it is in many cases of people frustrated by personal problems and socially maladjusted and that if they had not found these radical nationalist groups they had joined other groups in ideology totally opposed as their real objective and what attracts them is not violence and social causes. This is not to say that all nationalist movements based on unfounded arguments, they can always be exceptions, such as the struggles for independence by the European colonies in America, but nationalist parties now seem to be looking more power individualistic than social good and it is common to propose an idealized future in case of separation, which does not correspond to reality occur, because not only the risk of civil war is run, rarely mentioned, but there is also the possibility of foreign invasions was produced as proof the history of Greece. I think it is much more sensible to propose a model of autonomous state to avoid breaking nations, but ensuring some form of self-government, because after all unity is strength.




Today it is common to hear about the different types of governments that exist in the world or different democratic models, a system of government to be adequate need as possible over the territory in an effective way, but one of the biggest problems encountered today are caused by proportional political systems, these systems theory were created with the idea of giving policy to all ideological tendencies representation, however in practice the opposite effect because many cases after an election that countries using this type of government are in a situation of powerlessness, not being able the winning parties to form a working majority. Italy is an example of failure of this system for their great tendency to break political alliances often leading to their legislatures last barely a year in most cases. O Spain whose apparent stability is the result of subjecting the government to the blackmail of the autonomist parties seeking the secession of the state and do not represent the interests of all but those of their own autonomous community, this means that after each vote the winner match to negotiate with these secessionist parties and the price paid to form a government will be the gradual destruction of the state. So I think the only way to give governments, political solidity that a country needs without relying on dictatorial models or Monarchists, is to create a republic with a majority electoral system to the second round for the most voted party can get fifty-one percent of the seats so they can govern with sufficient stability, the other forty-nine percent would be held by the other parties, of course before the second round the parties could form alliances but this would not be a compulsory procedure, as the largest party would form a majority in the case of attending alone and therefore get the necessary seats for the country to be governed, and the election period would be more likely to come to an end normally. In any case we can say that this model would not be representative because in the second round, the winner of the two that is entered into would be the most votes obtained. That said I would note that this is an opinion on current models of government, but I think the best model would be one in which each and every one of the laws were elected directly by citizens, in order to have a true democracy, but surely this will take too long to arrive given the little interest shown by politicians in it.




Today it is hard to imagine that would be a perfect world without social inequalities in which all citizens have their basic needs met, but this world is possible, it is not an unworkable utopia, but this requires that citizens have the will and sufficient to drive change toward a society that can be considered truly what evolved imagination. For this purpose possible first be necessary to establish a strict birth control by all couples to have only two children except the case in which they were given permission to have three, with this a fixed number of inhabitants it would ensure which would allow them the means of production they could maintain sufficient quality life. Having achieved this could move to the next consistent step in ensuring employment for all citizens, meaning that every person from the moment of his birth would have secured his job as if it were an essential part of the complex machine that is a city thus be possible to have a better life and to emancipate before, it would also be possible to guarantee unemployment benefits to resolve any cases of temporary loss of work, this subsidy could in no way be like a salary, for only must contribute the necessary for basic living expenses for a higher subsidy is not a good incentive to work, albeit in a society in which there was an effective birth control the number of jobs always coincide with the number of inhabitants so the unemployment would not exist except temporarily.

In a developed society a permanent economic growth would not be necessary, because although this is all developed society useful to give more importance to spread the wealth that indefinite growth, as growth plays a role of placebo of the masses more to create them the expectation that it may be your only way of salvation to leave their abusive situation and semi-slavery. The lack of growth unnerving especially those who refuse to provide basic rights to citizens, because they cannot justify being in many cases rich countries however these social rights are not recognized, so it is often in crisis economic is a tendency to distract citizens encouraging them to participate in wars which if you win, they can resolve their problems at the expense of the loser, and if it is lost, then the perpetrator state will be rid of those pesky unemployed who He did not intend to help by sharing their wealth. A useful measure to prevent exploitation would oppose illegal immigration, because this is ideal for operators to achieve their ends means, for rootless and without financial resources citizen will always be willing to accept a lower salary to the detriment of citizens native, it is clear that the more similar their leaders are citizens of either culturally or racially more difficult state prove that they also exploit them unemployed, it serves for operators always have hand willing cheap labor to accept any job and any salary, to be unemployed than jobs. A company controlling its population will no longer have such a pressing need to grow and be guaranteed to all citizens working from the moment of birth. This does not mean that in a world evolved all wages have to be necessarily equal, but if it is logical that the state ensure that all citizens are entitled to at least one job, which not surprisingly is only possible if each country controls its population.

Also would be guaranteed by the state obtaining housing because to be full employment and a number of people always fixed would be easy to provide in the form of cheap rental or purchase secured loan, because by not missing employment payment serious housing insurance and so all young people could become independent once fulfilled the majority of age.

A perfect society is one in which democracy is real and not fake like the present, because politicians only turn to the citizens to elect their leaders every four or five years and these people naively believe that is fair, because from his early childhood are taught in school that this political system corrupt in which we live is a democracy, but genuine democracy is one in which each and every one of the laws are voted individually by citizens, this could easily done in a form through internet, but those politicians, false democrats, who pardoned other political thieves every day, of course not want to lose their privileges and why not propose, because this model of false democracy that was born in Greece in 508 a. C, had the sole purpose of satisfying the desires of the new business class representing seafarers have industrial potters of all kinds against the privileges of the landed gentry, and relied on the people to get the necessary power but not ready to share with the. More recently a similar situation with the English Civil War of 1642 era began calling current democracy was repeated, people should wonder why there at the same time dictatorships and democracies misnamed, the reason is very simple and that are analogous political systems, because in both cases it claims to be in an egalitarian system that guarantees freedom when that is not true because in both cases people's access to power is indirect and symbolic, there is no denying that progress towards democracy it represents an advance for society, but as long as completion, and power is delivered to the people by recognizing this to decide each and every one of the laws.

Would also be different unions, as would be more oriented to perform their duties in the field of law and the legal profession has become a parallel power to the state, nor is it logical to allow these organizations to disturb the public peace by organizing altercations, simply because these affirm be of social interest, then fight for the good of workers in a company can be legitimate, but that does not entitle harm to other citizens to resort to more own criminal practices.

Another characteristic of a developed society is its refusal to rely on religious organizations should not confuse religion with religious organization for religion is a way of thinking and a way of philosophy, which is lawful, but religious organizations which aims is to compete with the state for power, it is fair that society is moral and educate their children accordingly, but it is also fair to refuse to accept those organizations who hypocritically claim to represent God but their own benefit, the tragic consequences that history has shown, there are still governments today, they agree with these organizations, to supply them with an alibi with which to conceal their crimes in exchange for money, some organizations that seek to give moral lessons when they should receive , so in a perfect world these organizations have to disappear and no more stand between the man and God.


Chapter 3 - SCIENCE




Arguably from a symbolic point of view to each number corresponds a color in this way the color of the numbers would be this.

0 White, 1 Black, Red 2, Green 3, 4, Red, 5 Dorado, 6 Blue 7 Brown 8 Red 9 Blue.

It can be seen that the red color is repeated in even numbers and not in odd so it can be deduced that the colors with low frequency in the electromagnetic spectrum colors are in even numbers and numbers with frequency colors more high are in odd numbers.

If we analyze the meaning of numbers from a serious this metaphysical view.

Zero: It represents the void, feminine, nothing, but nothing like complementary of something, the space between two slings or opposite the crest of a deep, water, cold, planets, stars with respect the galactic core, the circle with the center point.

One: This number represents something, existence, masculine, item, matter, the sun, the central coordinator.

The two: This number represents the association between zero and one, arises the existence of gender, the binary function, the duality between the void and the particle, the magnetic polarities, as one may represent the male.

Three: This number represents life, creating a pre-organized structure to the appearance of the circle, each point is supported by the other and thus separating form the pyramid stage prior to the development of more complex structures, also represents differentiation between above and below, the exception and the rule.

Four: This number is progress for three to add one more point square key element is formed in the crystal structures.

Five: The number found in the middle of numbering and represents a circle with five points distributed on its circumference, five is like one but in a more evolved and complex form, it also represents wisdom.

Six: This number represents the goal, stability, spiritual feelings.

Seven: Represents the earth, matter, work, warmth, comfort. Like the three may also represent the norm and exception, the rule represented by the group of number five and the exception represented by the number two.

Eight: This number is similar to the fourth but doubled.

Nine: It is like a six to zero but also represents the end of the road, retirement, sunset, serenity.


Meaning of colors


White: This color can represent male or female values depending on the circumstances. It represents truth, justice, light, day, female horizontal line and in some planes vertical, sugar, standard stability. It may also represent divine values and taproot communicating all levels with the higher.

The black: This color like white can also represent male or female values. Represents the night, rest, ignorance, it may represent evil depending on the circumstances but not necessarily. As masculine symbolism represents the center point number one and infrared energy.

Red: This color represents the masculine energy, technology, the simple pleasure derived from healthy things in life, vigor, salt, except, matter, also it can be associated with evil or ignorance, but as in the case of black single color depending on the circumstances because the colors themselves could be defined as benign in its basic nature.

It also represents the vertical line and the center of the circle where the coordinator or presidential element, it can also represent the masculine is.

Green: This color represents life because it is in the middle of the electromagnetic spectrum, i.e. between the red and the blue, green combines the most effective way the energy of red and the spiritual forces of blue, usually in the cosmos in most cases the most appropriate response to circumstances is intermediate because it is the most balanced, representing just the green.

Brown: This color represents the land, labor, material, comfort is a warm color that combines the characteristics of different colors, strength and vitality red green without being completely stable in a certain way. It may also represent drought and meanness.

The Blue: This color represents the philosophy and spiritual values, being opposed to red is cooler and more intuitive. It can be considered a feminine color but depending on the circumstances.


Derived colors


Yellow: This color represents the illusion of living has a part of the energy of red and another green higher frequencies can represent knowledge but vanity.

Orange: This is similar to yellow and represents mainly vitality.

Pink: it contains the strength of the red but tempered by the serenity of the bank, is primarily emotional.

Violet: It's like the blue but in a slightly higher frequency, can represent imagination and as blue elevated spiritual feelings.


It will be noted that sometimes seems to be a contradiction between the qualities attributed to numbers and colors but their qualities depend on the plane in which they are and depending on the circumstances one thing in a different plane can behave in the opposite way if being a contradiction, an example of this are the stars, if considered as objects that revolve around the galactic nucleus can be considered feminine and passive objects, but if we only take into account a star then we can consider it as a male sun his once you have planets revolving around about him acquiring a feminine meaning. Another example is zero or one numbers or black or white, these numbers and colors can represent male or female values without being a contradiction, number one is male would be black but turn the black color also can be considered feminine as the plane in which you are because in reality both numbers and colors represent the same thing but seen upside down. It could be understood that all things have inside male or female values but the predominance of one force or another will then depend on the circumstances, this does not mean that they have a magnetic polarity or sexual orientation defined what it means is that such guidance It depends on the level where you are.




One of the main dilemmas that scientists and science fiction writers is raised. What will happen to the solar system when the sun completes its cycle power generator and becomes a white dwarf? Today it is common among scientists consider that the life of the stars ends at that time when finished mostly nuclear fuel goes into a white dwarf, but I understand that does not have to be. The reason is simple and is that from my point of view what the star would be ending his life is really only the first stage of it. I would be moving from a phase of high consumption of initial energy in a relatively short period of time, about ten billion year to another reverse in which consume much less energy but in a much longer period, other eighty billion years, when it would end really the solar system and the current cycle of the cosmos, which would end his life by compressing and assembly of all the galaxies in a sphere where all matter in the cosmos would meet to begin other regenerative process of matter that would lead to a new universe by a large explosion.

But the key question in this case would be. How would they be able to survive the inhabitants of the solar system with a white dwarf star type would issue a much lower amount of energy that emits now? The answer would be the application of various methods for collecting energy.

The first method would be to install collectors satellites energy in low orbit near the sun, where the light intensity is higher, then a large number of satellites would be between the different orbits of the planets, in order to serve as a bridge to transport energy, which would be sent by laser beams from a satellite to another until it reaches the destination planet.

Another method could be used tanker ships, these vessels may transport the energy in chemical form from the place of supply in the sun, there by an electrolysis process the water would be separated into its basic elements hydrogen and oxygen and thus may accumulate then the energy released its serious destiny to become water again and restart the process. To minimize the possible use of reaction gases ships could use own solar panels with those who pay their own energy and use that energy to print a high speed reaction gases used in propulsion and minimize the amount needed, in addition to reach the fueling stations in the sun or landing on planets, these tanker ships would not have to necessarily stop, because it does not try to transship gas but to transship energy, so this could done on the fly by using lasers and thus could minimize the use of reaction gases.

The stars to get to the white dwarf stage would consume much less energy than in the previous phase, but at this stage his life could be extended much further in time, perhaps five times more than in its primary stage, so not they could be considered in any old case, just at this stage of their life spend much less nuclear fuel but with a much longer duration, thus form would consume energy inversely proportional to the above.

It is also important to note that at this stage of human evolution the amounts of energy needed for life would be much lower than at the beginning, being many energy-saving systems that could be used. In addition the systems to harness the energy would come alone to the planets could be more effective than in the past because of the improved ability to harness energy could get ten to one hundred times more energy than was achieved with initial methods. They could use methods as collecting energy from ring collector’s satellites in orbiting planets. Or install a large number of solar panels in a wide part of the planetary surface. Could also extract energy from the interior of the planets by using large pipes that would transport hot gases to the planetary core, these gases when heated and would amount would trigger generators to produce electricity. Thus the passage of the stars to the state of white dwarf would not necessarily mean the end but only the beginning of a new longest stage in which civilization would simply have to increase their ingenuity to adapt. Another possible way to achieve serious energy use nuclear energy of matter but going beyond what has been achieved so far, that is transforming the material for this is fissile and therefore useful for producing energy or also using thermonuclear energy contained in the gases of large planets, if that were possible. It is true that solar energy and its derivatives is the ideal way to get power, it is more natural and safe, but this would be a possible option if the sun's energy was no longer viable. Also consider questionable the assertion of some scientists who believe that the red giant phase which expected the stars arrive on the stage before the white dwarf involving the destruction of the closest planet to the sun, because of shop expansion as largest surface of the star is likely that the resulting density in the outermost part is not consistent enough to be able to achieve such a result, it should be noted that in the expansion phase the star would have to pass measure several million kilometers more than its original diameter, to achieve orbit of the closest planets and consequently its surface density would also be much smaller and therefore less dangerous. Nor you can know with confidence what will be the degree of intensity with which stars consume their nuclear fuel in that state, perhaps the most expansive form only with the biggest stars, which eventually end up exploding as supernovas.

However if the most extreme course should occur and the solar system proves uninhabitable always be the possibility of emigrating to other uninhabited young stars and to found a new society.




Arguably what time the cosmos refers is divided into two main planes, vertical and horizontal, first is vertical and timeless plane and governs what we might call the universal laws, these laws are as the foundation on which events are supported and are stable regardless of the time from which it comes, the universal laws derive from the inherent truth in the universe and are therefore stable and independent of time. Then there is the horizontal plane of the time, this is only the result of the change of position of the material, but made in a progressive and harmonious, from a position of higher energy and chaos to a lower energy and order, or also could be defined as the evolution of an unstable and primitive situation to a more stable and evolved, this is what we call progress, since the change of matter occurs in a logical order, creating more complex structures and in accordance with the laws universal. It could be said then that evolution is the transformation of energy into more complex forms.

In these circumstances our perception of time is the consequence of being able to remember the position it had stuff before, but the matter does not remain fixed but progress on a scale that could be defined as low too high in the process of evolution universe, which is why it makes no sense to talk about time travel possible because this would require force back the whole universe in its movement which makes no sense. However it is possible to consider the time travel indirectly, i.e. when a civilization comes into contact with another more backward in this case is as if they step back in time itself. It is also reasonable to consider returning to a bygone era but going forward, as another possibility of time is its ability to be repeated, because in the universe is common tendency to make things circular and repetitive, so it is reasonable to think that once the cycle of possible combinations in the matter have been exhausted these combinations will again repeat the same events and therefore eventually be repeated again, in this case a repetition is a reboot because there will be nothing in be compared to establish that it is a future. Therefore in the universe they exist aside the laws that govern it and are constant outside time, and derived from the essential truths of the cosmos, and the other time is a succession of events there that are happening progressive and organized and developed in a logical order and in accordance with universal laws form.




Arguably, from my point of view that the cosmos began as a point at which all matter was concentrated, this area had the characteristics that currently a black hole is attributed, i.e. a place where their intense gravity snaps even light, the subject of this originator point cosmos mass would consist of super concentrated like the nuclei of atoms. In this central point would find contained all matter and energy of a previous expansion process, because in the cosmos all are scrolled even circulating energy, so that the end of the explosive process which resulted in the expansion of matter in space and the subsequent formation of galaxies all matter and energy return to the initial point that out.

After the great creative explosion of the cosmos first small galaxies form, then these galaxies merge to form larger galaxies, and finally all large galaxies come together to form a super galaxy, then the subject of this last great anger galaxy moving towards the center where all matter and energy payback merged to form the core of a new originator universe.

This process has no beginning and no end, because in the cosmos the same time also has its end, from which all events are to be repeated from the beginning. Once all matter and energy return by the effect of gravity to the center point will be a change in the original matter and this is transmuted to form the precursor material of a new explosion, resulting in a new universe and training of new galaxies. Arguably the resulting universe after the explosion will not be identical to the previous but very similar, because the combinations of possible events are as many as possible combinations have the matter. This does not mean that the new universe will always prove different, because once the possible combinations are exhausted, the cosmos will have completed their combination options and thus also its duration in time and therefore the following combination is the first of the existing list and then repeats the same time. Of course the time required for combinations of events in the cosmos finish is logically immense, but for eternity any measure of time is negligible and it is important to note that completed the process of combinations the same time will begin again.

The process of evolution in the spiritual realm is different, because every soul of every living along their eternal life they will live all possible experiences and each new creation of the cosmos exchange their role with respect to the previous cycle, living in each new repetition of time in a different role previously lived. Once again each being repeated again the same cosmic life then if you can consider the number of possible combinations as completed. You can say then that all beings live each and every one of the lives and experiences that other beings have passed before the cycle of possible combinations in the cosmos ends. It should be borne in mind that the concept of time is relative because when the same events recur cannot talk about future events for the same time will restart again.

It is possible that after each cosmic cycle all souls come together to form one life and one particle, for matter is also life, and from that moment starts again its split to form new particles and new souls. Actually all matter is life, the so-called organic life is actually the result of adding an individual spirit to a body created from the subject, which is mineral life. In fact the reason for the existence of organic life is the need spirit embodied in a material body that amplifies spiritual sensations, for the spirit is essentially energy and life is stronger by joining the art, is the right mix both things as progressing toward happiness, also possess a mortal body allows the spirit to renew and relive the sensations again as if for the first time. The reincarnated spirit in a material body that has the ability to experience intense feelings that the very laws of matter provide you, for being not controlled by it is always exposed to new sensations medium can build the world according to his own imagination while respecting the laws of nature.

In fact all matter has life because everything that exists is alive, the difference is that there are things that have a distinct life, such as plants or people and there are other life forms that are part of something bigger like rocks or the sea, in this case they are only part of other lives that are planets or galaxies, matter is therefore life individually, whereas instead of organic life is the result of adding a spiritual life to a mineral life , to join the spirit with the body, for nature it determined that the subject of the planets could be used for this purpose. Arguably this is as if there were only two real class’s beings, spirits consisting essentially of energy and planets formed by material that is stabilized by concentrated energy. It is even possible that all mineral matter that forms planets and galaxies are really one being and its basic function is to provide support for the development of life forms differentiated as plants or people, i.e. form the scenario in which they would be expressed. It is also possible that at first the cosmos only one particle exists and one being, then that individual being divided into multiple particles and multiple beings. A being could be formed by a single particle or multiple particles, the difference is that one be formed by multiple particles maintain a bond that unite directly. At the end of the cosmic cycle all matter would meet again and the process would begin.

It could also be said that in the cosmos the two most important elements present are the matter and void; actually emptiness is just the mirror image of matter and cannot understand one without the other because they are the same thing but in reverse this bipolarity is actually the origin of the sex’s binary codes and magnetic fields. The field represents the existence and the absence empty but both the one and the other have existed since one cannot speak about the empty if not compared with the subject, therefore both must necessarily exist. In this context, the time is not more than the change caused by the motion of matter, and our perception of time should be able to remember the position that the matter dealt with before, but as combinations of matter are not unlimited the end time will restart.

It can also be said as a result of this bipolarity, that in the universe there are what you might call some immutable laws governing cosmic processes, but at the same time as opposed offers a wide range of options variables not subject to strict rules, i.e. the universe to be sustainable needs on the one hand the strength of a rigid and stable laws, but on the other always allows those basic laws is no question a wide range of different possibilities beings that inhabit it, these laws of nature They are not a whim because the absence of a major stable framework would not be possible to build a more complex universe that allows progress towards happiness, which is the real reason for existence. Normally when someone refers to truth or the divine is what those laws are concerned, it is what remains as immutable when doubts are clarified. Actually in this construction of the cosmos we all share as our spirit is eternal, but our degree of success will depend on the way in which we are able to understand these universal laws that are the true definition of God.

When a man is born, he forgets his spiritual memories temporarily, but instead acquires the characteristic of human life, because to achieve a happier life is better to keep the memories of the two planes, thus mixing can live each life as new and therefore more intensely.




From the beginning of time evolution of the species has aimed a unique mission is to advance to result in the creation of the human form. In turn this human form mission is to be the most appropriate means for the spirit is manifested in the material medium. It is through this interaction between the spiritual medium and the medium material and the spirit reaches its greatest degree of happiness, real reason to be reincarnated in human form and cause more than justified to explain the creation of such a complex shape, its purpose is to serve communication channel and spirit for expression in the art. Thus the human body is like a representation of the spirit but materially and must be able to serve as suitable expression medium. Just as the pure energy to be strong needs to be mixed with matter if you want to produce significant effects, just as the spirit needs to create a material body that will serve as a means of expression, because the spirit is mainly energy and the body it is mainly matter. In addition to the material means the spirit happens to have a mortal body that allows you to discover the world anew in each new incarnation and relive again the thrill of novelty, because happiness comes from the balance between remembering how useful, but forget it is no longer necessary. The average material is less intuitive than the spiritual but instead provides lots of excitement and new things that make life embodied spirit happier and more intense than if you only existed as a spirit. Thus the spirit first begins in the material form incarnating in animal forms, until the end reaching the human form, not being possible to return back, except when a new universe where everything will start starts.

Another feature of the human form is the division between the sexes, the division is intended to create a specialization in humans in order to increase its effectiveness, this does not mean that one sex put at a disadvantage compared to another; in principle specialization mission only that each sex is dedicated to a different but equally function necessary to achieve the best possible quality of life, it is true that specialization may involve the need to perform various tasks during the life of man and woman, but that does not mean that it has to be one happier than the other, because in a world developed specialization in labor is a widespread and necessary practice and nobody argues that this results in a specialty have to be worse than another necessarily, because although it differently men and women have the right to be just as happy.

Therefore the reincarnation of the spirit into matter is not a temporary situation but an end in itself, necessary for the spirit to reach its highest level of happiness when interacting with matter and be surprised by the continuous innovation that this provides and great intensity of emotions that are acquired in that medium. The real challenge of progress is to benefit from all that provides the human form but without preventing live a deeply moral and consistent with the values of the spirit life.


Chapter 4 - PHILOSOPHY




Arguably one of the ways of defining progress is the path that runs from darkness into light. One of the main features of the little evolved worlds is in my opinion the ease with which good ideas with the wrong mix, words like democracy, dictatorship, racism or feminism are clear examples of this, as is common in these and other cases trying to summarize in a much more complex issues simplistic and tends to gather in a totally different same word issues leading due to error, because it can be easily that the same word is used to refer to issues in a proper case and in other cases completely wrong and all this in order to circumvent really get into the merits. Since the end of World War II racism became a taboo subject which was not possible to speak without risking consequences unless it was to support miscegenation, as a result of the excesses of the Nazis believed that every rejection miscegenation implied support for them, this resulted in opportunists during Nazism resolutely joined the cause now took every opportunity to vilify those who oppose miscegenation. But the mistake of thinking that reject the mistreatment of other races necessarily imply acceptance of miscegenation, not realizing that it is precisely through miscegenation and racial minorities can be abused or exploited more easily committed, it is always better to live among equals so that they are more difficult cases of discrimination, a man will always be happier in a country where the police, senators, or the president are of their race. Therefore it may be contrary to miscegenation but also be contrary to slavery or any form of abuse, because you can believe and argue that it is better than the races live apart as a way to better secure its own fulfillment without this being a contradiction . Any idea is tenable if done peacefully even belief in racial superiority, and those who think they have the right to be respected, because many times throughout history those who seek evil have used correct ideas with in order to conceal their true intentions, an example of this is the use that is made of religion to support military imperialism, a religion can be perfectly honorable but that does not mean they are also all acts made in their name , in the same way defend racial purity may be right but that does not mean it is any means used to achieve it. Therefore say that the rejection of miscegenation is bad only because the Nazis served the support of their purposes may be completely wrong, in fact after World War imperialist countries like the United States used their alleged rejection of racism as a form to justify the invasion of the territories of other races and so use their natural resources, an example of this was the Iraq war was sought in this case justify and outside the war saying it was for the good of the country, but the result was total destruction and more than one million deaths as a result of the bombing and disease, and all in order to undercover to control its oil, this is an example that can also be crimes against humanity claiming to fight for the racial equality, but at the same time the United States within its borders racial minorities subject to a caste system denying social rights such as public health or guaranteed. It is clear that communism as an economic model has proved its failure, not wanting to recognize the benefits to the economy of private entrepreneurship, but it is also true that Western society lives lost in a mirage, being unable to see that the model economic materialistic proposed to them as perfect is actually an unjust system that prevents social integration, not guarantee the most basic rights. This shows that an idea may be correct but not the means used to achieve it, since it is often just an excuse with which to perpetrate unlawful acts that have nothing to do with it and in the case of racism the alleged rejection that some countries make it is only an instrument to justify their imperialist campaigns on other continents stating that recognized no racial boundaries are considered legitimate to invade or interfere in its internal affairs. This is proof that the best way to protect the rights of each race is precisely rejecting miscegenation and demanding equal rights for all citizens of the planet. The order brings to light and disorder that involves racial miscegenation only results in confusion and chaos that is precisely what interests the speculators who try to destroy social rights and turn citizens into slaves.

The Machismo words or feminism is another similar example because everyone understands its meaning differently to their own taste, the fact is that with the rise of so-called democratic models of political parties tried to get the vote of women working in inflating the myth of feminism and thus led to a degree of social fracture therefore be said that man and woman must make in life the same tasks is an unrealistic fallacy, because the proof is that the very nature made them different in order to increase the benefits of specialization could provide. The myth of feminism proposes that the realization of women is only possible to play these typically male tasks but if you ask a toddler if he agrees that his mother is absent to take place in the workplace, who believe that answer? Obviously its serious negative response because they are the hardest hit by feminism, because in those countries where it is very implanted is shockingly low birth rate and few children are born often do not see their parents more than brief moments of the day due to unnecessary competition to feminism leads women, because in many cases the effort to get money from two salaries is valued more than good attention to the children, a good solution would be for women carried off only part-time jobs at least while their children were small. Another example of how the feminist role has caused social being assimilated by some governments havoc in the case of marital separations, because in most cases the man is oppressed by the law, be required delivery of the salary, housing and child custody to the woman being stripped of all its assets even without regarded as responsible for it. This separation represents more than a public humiliation of man, because ideally all assets are divided equally and therefore the spouses could use the family home one month each and dividing custody of their children. It would obviously be different if he were guilty of separation one of the spouses, but a law that grants all rights and properties only part, besides being unjust is a real stimulus to cause separation.

It is true that feminism is valid in many circumstances because women have the right to be free no longer have to endure a man who mistreats, also has the right to be happy as a man, but that does not mean you should of forget that each sex was done by the different nature for a reason, not one to be considered a slave of the other, but not for a stupid competition between the sexes occurs to see who has the most striking career, as nature made different for different tasks are performed, but complementary to each other for the sake of all mankind, for the specialization of the sexes actually improves expectations that human beings can get.

Another example of the difference between the powers of a word and the reality is the case of democracies misnamed, because in those countries where they are used is assumed to be opposed to dictatorships political models, but such a statement is false because in reality are more alike than it appears, because in both cases the population has a reduced capacity for political participation, because it is common to allow citizens to choose only the composition of parliament but being fully vetted in the definition of the law, genuine democracy only possible when citizens can decide individually each and every one of the laws.




The great dilemma that society of the future must be raised about the great philosophers or thinkers is. Should they be considered as divine beings or human beings? The problem of the deification of ancient philosophers like Buddha or Christ is that to consider as divine beings superhuman and therefore tend to deny the possibility of questioning freethinker opinions or assertions of these philosophers. But the fundamental issue is that until the contrary is proved right thing is to see these philosophers or prophets as part of a changing world and therefore subject like others to the possibility of being wrong, this does not mean that many of their ideas cannot be good, what this means is that like the rest of the people who have contributed to the progress of humanity they too can make mistakes and therefore fair value their ideas, but it is also a mistake to think that these Ideas cannot be improved or cannot be wrong partly because the progress of philosophical or scientific is to be willing to question any idea because without this attitude is impossible to achieve real progress in the field of philosophy. The religion of the future will be characterized primarily by the freedom of thought and the ability to question everything.

Regarding the deification of former or present prophets or philosophers must say that the only thing that should be considered as divine is ideas, not people, because the same person can be given at the same time successful beliefs but also other completely wrong, only the ideas are divine since by divine can understand everything that is right and is in line with the great universal truths. The great philosophers and thinkers may have been a source of good for the world for their contributions in philosophy, but that does not mean they should be considered infallible only because ideas are. The problem to consider these beings as divine is that in this case the society is denied the opportunity to improve what they taught and his followers are then discussed in some unnecessary disputes not being able to understand that unless you prove it otherwise these beings must be regarded as philosophers and therefore subject to the possibility of hitting at times but also to the possibility of being wrong in others. Even in the event that these originators philosophers of religion really were influenced by higher beings not that be a reason to question the freedom of thought as these superior beings even better than we might also be wrong in some of his ideas, because only the ideas are not perfect people. There are also those who try to benefit from the supposed infallibility of these prophets and philosophers, as they argue the infallibility with the unjust and selfish to manipulate people and denying them freedom of thought for his own benefit end, this is what often happens in religious domes and is a real attack on freedom of thought citizens. What this shows is that you should not judge how bad religions or freethinkers who created them, because it really bad is use these philosophers to manipulate and use to denying society the right to dissent, because it must give the same right to other people to think freely or to question these philosophers if they deem it appropriate, as progress is an ongoing debate in which the right ideas remain and wrong are eliminated but this need not accept as infallible no person then must not be possible to improve their ideas. A religion is actually a philosophy based on a compilation of idea and to improve people, but it is a serious mistake to think that no matter how much faith you have in it or who I think cannot be questioned, because who says such thing is denying his followers the chance to improve it, so only ideas and not people can be considered perfect as an idea may be true, but a person contains within it many ideas which some are true but others do not. True religion will certainly be one that considers as essential to ensure freedom of thought so that any philosopher or prophet may be questioned in order to improve their teaching, because our ability to dissent is what brings us closer to God.

With regard to the possible influence of superior beings on our planet should be noted that it is reasonable to think that the universe may exist multitude of inhabited worlds more advanced than ours, and it is reasonable to think that at any time in our past, these beings they may have come into contact with our planet, and as a result have been able to raise convey some of their knowledge to us by philosophers, prophets or otherwise, but even if this were true, it would not be a reason to consider these beings as divine and infallible, because although it is reasonable to think that their ideas are better than ours they like us, could also be wrong, because they too would be in a process of evolution like us, but even if his ideas were true that no means that have not been able be modified after being transmitted because incorrect translations or modifies intended. The fact that religious books may have ideas or teachings transmitted by them does not mean that the entire contents of these books are due to attribute to them. So in the world of philosophy and the most important ideas, must always defend freedom of thought against those who deny this right, because only truth is divine and therefore only the ideas successful they are, they understood as divine all what it is true and consistent with the great universal truths. Instead religions are formed with many ideas and it is reasonable to think that some be some but not others, because only divine ideas are not people. So right thing is not going into unnecessary arguments about the supposed divinity of philosophers or prophets originators of religion, the right thing is to use freedom of thought to improve them in all that progress allows.




It is regrettable to see the large number of scammers who populate today our libraries, all are presented to us as a kind of saviors, all claim to have the truth for the salvation of our souls but they are all different, they all claim to seek the good but none of them he is able to condemn evil or point it openly.

But even more outrageous to see how these false prophets use the method attributed a false communication with extraterrestrial assumptions or superior beings in order to make money or prevent any criticism of their claims, people should know that most of his ideas in They have actually been copied from other books, or based on conclusions lacking any evidence. What is truly unfortunate is that many people believe only by making such statements and are not able to realize that the truth is only found by an impartial analysis of things and not the easy solution of believing in those status of prophet attributed , contacted or guidance to impress his followers.

There are also those who try to present themselves as benefactors claiming warn of beings alleged evil aliens, this is just another vile strategy so that we do not realize that the true evil beings they are, using this strategy because there are people who are more likely to believe that extraterrestrial beings exist can only be evil, this is usually because those are petty think others also have to be, and do not realize they end up falling into the trap of his own vanity. Do they truly believe that a civilization that we could take a million years ahead, there would be nothing else to do to come to earth with intent to annoy its inhabitants? This happens because they are only willing to accept higher extraterrestrial beings in the technological aspect but not in the moral aspect, and that's a contradiction. I do not pretend here that aliens may not be on our planet, not pretend to say that all who write about spiritual issues need to be impostors, what I mean is above all aware that the fact that someone the title contacted matching or guide does not mean it's true.

In this current era is easy to find many books in which any idea defends crazy this is and all with a great profusion of alleged scientific arguments, but at the same time with great contradictions together, we must bear in mind that the that in a book called evidence submitted something, does not mean that it demonstrate its certainty, it is very common to use half-truths or only partly true tests in order to favor a false view. Because within the same book or the same belief there may be many truths but also many lies or truths modified in order to mislead readers. Therefore who seeks the truth must seek itself not carried away by the easy argument of those who proclaim themselves guides or contacted, nor by those who use politics or religion in order to seize power. Because these false prophets do not have the courage to defend their arguments recognizing that only express their own opinions and are actively using these subterfuges to get care they do not deserve.

The truly evolved man is one who before accepting an opinion analyze all things impartially regardless of fame, social significance, or the powers that these false prophets will do themselves, because analyzing things impartially is also a way of exercising freedom.

In this world in which we live, most of what they tell us lies, but the biggest lies the count, who say protect us from lies.




Today it is very common to see in society the existence of multiple sects, all different but all claiming to have the truth, some people approach them looking for comfort and guidance for personal problems, but girl people do not know that some of these sects are destructive character that is included in its dogma denying its followers the right to dissent imposing them unconditional acceptance of all its provisions, it should be noted that these organizations actually are usually founded by one or more persons who only turn to their own opinions or information from others to form the ideology of the sect, but without providing any evidence of the truth of his ideas, with the main objective to obtain money or simply satisfy a desire for personal power, but is imposed on the followers founder acceptance of this character as a divine being and therefore unquestionable, imitating forms of the Catholic Church. No should never lose common sense and the ability to challenge for these organizations try to convince his followers that all truth is in them and all the mistakes in others.

These sects often resort to various methods to capture its followers, one of them is to inflate your ego into believing that being a member of the sect supposed to be a great privilege and while on it and follow its precepts will possess great wisdom and will be a advantaged against others.

Another method to control them is to try to make it difficult for followers to obtain other media outside the sect is advising read only the books supplied by this and frightening them regarding the use of other means of knowledge.

Another feature of destructive sects is to try to separate their followers from anyone who does not belong to it even from his family in order to ensure control over them, the paradox is that very rarely these followers come to question the seriousness of the statements made by the leader and if so are branded traitors and are subsequently expelled.

It is logical that people seek their inner development, it is also true that this present age is characterized by a moral vacuum true, so it is important for anyone who is interested in their inner development to distinguish between those who propose a doctrine with freedom of opinion and those who try to impose their dogmas only because every ideology that denies freedom of thought to his followers is certainly reprehensible.




When a person spends his whole life living in a materialistic way and denying the existence of life after death, it may happen that after this happens, the spirit enters into a situation of bewilderment when he does not understand his new situation after losing his body. So instead of evolving and trying to follow its path towards a new reincarnation, it can happen that this spirit tries to deny the obvious and tries to continue in a house as if it still had a human body. This is one of the reasons that can explain the phenomenon of haunted houses. These spirits, instead of humbly acknowledging that they were wrong and ascending to the spiritual world, on the contrary tend to create the appearance of a false body by condensing the particles of their spirit, this is what is usually called a phantom or specter. The condensation of these particles allows a certain interaction with matter, but in a much more deficient way than it would be with a human body. Then for a certain time they remain in the house trying to believe that they still have their physical body. When someone goes to live in that house, so-called paranormal phenomena begin to take place. These phenomena are nothing other than the attempt of that spirit to throw the new tenants of a house that he considers his own, then begins a game of mouse and cat by which the spirit is dedicated to persecuting and scaring continuously the tenants using all means at their fingertips like throwing objects, making noise or pretending to be a horrible monster or a demon. These phenomena usually occur at night because the spirits have very little energy compared to the human body and during the day the strong solar radiation blocks the weak energy of the spirit, preventing its manifestation in an obvious way. In general, tenants react by trying to escape from this situation or try to deny that this is occurring, rarely consider communicating with the spectrum, to try to find out why it is there, or to make him understand that this is not his place and that he has to leave the house. Because the more you tend to flee the more aggressiveness of the invading spirit grows and therefore the best solution would be to go to the counterattack and demand that you stop frightening and leave. It is as if fear increases your strength or your discomfort. Occasionally the occupying spirit of the house remains in it because they believe they have a pending account that needs to be solved, this can happen when someone is the victim of a tragic death or is buried abnormally in the area of the dwelling many times in secret, then this soul refuses to leave because it considers that a clarification is necessary regarding the events that took place. In this case, the spirit tries to direct the new tenants towards the solution of the matter that it implies. In this case, a solution could be to unearth their remains and take them to the appropriate place, or perhaps need a farewell ceremony.

There are also those who attract these beings to homes through the use of methods such as the Ouija board. This table is dangerous because through it these spirits can cause problems to its inhabitants or even trigger situations of possession.
It is possible that the problem begins when the communication is closed badly and the door between the two worlds is open.
Once this situation has started, it is difficult to dismiss these entities as spirits of degenerate or criminal people who see in this contact an opportunity to try to steal the body from its rightful owner. These degenerate entities try to prevent their expulsion by pretending to be demons, by levitating objects or by speaking in other languages, but all these qualities are not proper only of demonic beings, but are normal qualities in the spiritual life.

Sometimes these beings are attracted to the homes by demonic sects, these sects are not able to understand that evil can never be a profitable path, and eventually end up paying for this type of behavior. Because it is a mistake to think that there can be beings whose only activity is to do evil. Evil is an error and a deviation from the correct moral behavior and therefore all the beings that enter this way are destined to return towards the good if they want to be happy. The demon only makes sense as a symbolic character that represents evil behavior, but no one can live from that behavior eternally, because to go to evil is a mistake that who harms the most is who uses it. Choosing injustice as habitual behavior is a serious mistake, because it can cause a momentary benefit, but always in exchange for a greater long-term evil. That is the meaning of the phrase "agree with the devil". In the long run all the beings of the universe will become perfect, when they understand that good is the only reasonable way.

The ideal when you are in a haunted house is to try to understand the reasons why these beings are in them and not see them as enemies necessarily, because perhaps they need our help to continue to the afterlife.




What is a religion? A religion is actually a form of philosophy, an extended form of thought but widespread. In the past, as in the case of Greece, there were great multitude of them even in the same city or within the same family; because at that time more than a religion could be said that the common is the lack of a standard view with regard to religious ideas. Why some people think that in ancient Rome, or the Muslim kingdoms of the Middle Ages, there was greater religious freedom than in the Christian kingdoms, but bear in mind that in the Roman Empire, would have been impossible attempt rulers to impose a particular religious approach, since there was no official or widespread religion in which to rely. And in the case of Islam it would be a contradiction to their political or religious leaders pretend prohibit other religions, when in fact, this religion was copied from Judaism and Christianity, for what the author wanted to create a written and monotheistic religion religions were mentioned but adding their own ideas. It was not then a true tolerance, but rather a logical conclusion, since Islam is actually based on Christianity but with added Arab beliefs.

It is true that religions are a form of philosophical thought and therefore can be considered logical existence, but it is also true that throughout history rulers and religious leaders have tried to use it to manipulate citizens, sometimes self-proclaimed divine beings as in the case of the Egyptian pharaohs, and in other cases self-proclaimed infallible beings and exclusive representatives of God as in the case of the popes of the Catholic church. These are just attempts to hijack the freedom of thought in order to control citizens by manipulating their opinions. But the divine persons there are no truths can only be considered as such. Therefore it should not blame religion for what they do with it those who manipulate because every man and society need order in the field of philosophy and ideas, because it is only possible to create a truly evolved world if the same time is deeply moral, so the future world no longer need religious domes that have become the seat of evil, for religion is nothing but a way of thinking and the end of religious domes is manipulating men standing between them and God. Because there are no divine men only divine ideas, because God is everything that is right and in line with universal truths. A man may be inspired by his search for truth, but that does not mean you cannot make mistakes. Create religious organizations, in order to dispute the power to governments or use the resource to faith, virgins or saints to deny freedom of criticism and thought to citizens is an attack against freedom, so the man future no longer need such intermediaries and teach religion through books or schools, but it will be a religion based on reason and science, not on dogma or superstition, because you will understand that you can only reach the truth If the search for himself through his freedom of thought, because the only way that religions can make progress is by accepting that its founders are men and as such can also be wrong, a religion is actually a form of philosophy and science and if you study without obsessions or unmovable ideas, it is understood that as the rest of the science involved in it, and providing whatever possible to improve it, actually all humanity will win. This does not mean they cannot be absolute truths, what it means is that we must recognize that every person can make mistakes by important it be considered, you can have faith in something, but that does not mean that this is due to lose capacity to doubt it and improve it accordingly.




What can be defined as a true messiah? In ancient times it was assumed that a man was considered a messiah or a precursor of progress was an essential requirement to undertake miracles or anything supernatural. Actually every scientist who contributes to the development of their society either in philosophy or in the rest of science has the qualities normally attributed to a messiah, therefore a messiah or prophet is but one who has been ahead of its time and authentic divinity of their actions is to be found more in his ideas or discoveries in his own person. But then what is divine inspiration? Arguably it is the ability to understand the keys of nature, this quality may depend on the intelligence but also of opportunity and the availability of time, and do not forget that everything precursor of his time could not be whether before there had assimilated the knowledge that previous generations have bequeathed. Thus the divinity of a prophet is in his teachings where it is and not him as a person, for the progress of humanity is through these scientists and philosophers as stated and no sense pretending elevate a man describing it as It divine when the result of his ideas is the result of the contributions of all mankind. So for someone to reach divine inspiration you do not need to be helped by higher or extraterrestrial beings, if that helps better still given, but any man at any given time can find the path to enlightenment itself.




Often when someone speaks of knowing sites or new things, generally they refer to visit places in the field of geography, but there is a huge unexplored world within ourselves, namely in the field of study of culture and the philosophy. And I say this because it is regrettable the lack of interest usually given to inner development of the individual, few of these plans for leisure includes space for reading a book or meditate, or to improve knowledge we have of science. But it is important to note that it is through our inner enrichment as we can actually improve our quality of life, since increasing our culture and make a reflection on the world around us we actually improves. When we think of taking a trip must not forget that try to understand the world through science is an exciting journey worth touring. Some think that man uses only fifteen percent of its intelligence capability, this is not true, what is true is what is used in reduced form is the ability to meditate and reflect on the world we It surrounds, which means less understanding of things and therefore a worse use of the circumstances that life gives us. The man of the future will be different because they will have done himself through his own reflection, as one of the last stages of human development will be to improve their own capacity for criticism and search for the real truth, because life does not have to be just the experience of simple sensations that gives us daily activity is also important to develop as a person through our inner enrichment. Because the moment in which we analyze things without accepting ideological impositions or established prejudices began to be aware of the truth around us and then we started really to be free and to participate unattached in the design world we have. In the world there may be great truths, but also big lies, our right and our duty is to learn to differentiate between them. The man of the future will be deeply worship but also deeply moral, spiritual and feelings as the search for truth need not be contradictory and would not consider anything as true without having done before an impartial analysis in this regard. Arguably one of the ways of defining progress is the path that separates darkness from light, for this reason you need to stop from time to time in the maelstrom of daily life to realize that seeing the world from the perspective of a calm analysis found that it have many more things to think when a quick observation is made. Few things are as emotional as understanding the cosmos through meditation is the closest thing there is to see the face of God. Arguably the main difference between an ordinary man and a philosopher is that a normal man lives life as a philosopher as well as living thought life, that is your greatest satisfaction is to understand the profound meaning of nature, is as done a true journey of the mind for the essential mechanics of the cosmos.




It is regrettable to see how many people make subject their self-esteem possession of jewelry and the desire of ostentation, I believe the future will belong to a society that does not need or jewelry or tattoos or paint were used to distort the face nails or skin, or to distort height high heels, no injuries being caused to place pending or mutilation of sexual organs, since our body is already perfect at birth and does not need added such class. Future society regarded as its real jewels, dignity, decency and sincerity; because there is greater merit jewelry that everyone has within his heart. The world of the future need not rituals like baptism to symbolize what they believe, because the real commitment is what everyone does without pressure or conditions, but by his own will. Because the world of the future will have as one of its great foundations pursuit of merit through personal achievement towards improving oneself, without accepting that no one intends to say in advance which is the truth, but searching for oneself through freedom of thought.




Truly we live in a time when it is given more importance to appearances than reality, this is a particularly materialistic time when obtaining money is considered more important than dignity, but what sense does the money if you do not have dignity? It is true that money is important to be happy, but a person can have all the money in the world and be the same unhappy time, and someone else can live with right and yet be happy, this is because happiness has its rules and one of them is to live with dignity and common sense. But in this current age it is given more importance to money than to dignity, growth that solidarity is a false age where it takes more account of appearances than reality and that what is called prejudice is just what it is not, where it is said that this God is right where it is housed evil, because the truth is not what is said but what is.

Man must learn to reflect on the world around him, must understand that the current political game matches between left and right is nothing more than a play with which dupe citizens to deny them the right to participate directly in the design of laws, to prevent them can vote on them individually, which is the true way of expressing genuine democracy. Left parties say worry about workers but imitate the ways of the Athenian slave-owning democracy in the V century BC, because their policies direct society toward a mestizo and disunited world, resulting in job insecurity, do not care to sell his country and his race for a handful of coins, say worry about workers but only interested enriched with public money, and promoting the reduction of sentences for criminals to the level of absurdity. In some countries like Spain punishment for killing a man is the same as for killing a thousand, this shows with politicians who are identified.

On the other hand the right wing parties strive to manipulate information in order for citizens to vote just what is prescribed, in order to maintain their bourgeois privileges and coalesce with religious organizations to supply them with an alibi of good conduct undeserving. They try to dismantle all forms of social protection to create a trench country, where the rule is, every man for himself, while they are protected in their lairs all their money. You cannot create an evolved society; if at the same time is a disunited society.

Called "humanitarian" organizations are mainly divided between those using terrorists practices to achieve their goals and gain publicity, and only pursue an economic profit, the first claim that their alleged good intentions justify any means used to achieve it, and the second using own methods of usury, then use those in need for help, but his main interest is to get rich, because many of them take decades talking about hunger in the world to raise money, but do not worry about attacking the evil in its root, i.e. birth control, real cause of overpopulation. It is true that the world's wealth is poorly distributed, but it is also true that if all the economic growth of a country is invested in raising more and more people, then it is clear that hunger will never go away, but this seems not to interest those supposedly humanitarian organizations.

This is a false and amoral time when pharmaceutical companies no longer seek to cure diseases seeking to sell medicines, you must understand that your business is the disease and not health, because if people were healthy could not sell their drugs, the fund is engaged in selling hope, but at a high price, it is necessary that citizens discover their own power of self-healing and away from those speculators attacking the source of the disease that is rejecting the bad habits of life. A drug can be very useful, but only if used in the right measure and as a last resort, but the right thing is to act first on the causes of the disease, rejecting the unhealthy behaviors that have sprung up.

Since the end of the Second World War the victorious nations only have worried divide the world claiming that the bad guys are the others, but have not hesitated to overthrow democratic governments when they have opposed his intentions to dominate the world, as happened in Chile by the United States or Czechoslovakia by the Soviet Union, or supporting dictators when it suited them. Generally governments encourage citizens to intervene in wars voluntarily or by telling force that is for the good of his family or patriotism, but basically just looking favor companies in which they participate and so increase your profits, but at the expense of the lives of citizens. As in most cases this there are exceptions, but only with a sensible attitude and away the passionate reactions to which we often try to steer politicians can tell the difference.

This is a hypocritical era in which most promotes debauchery that freedom, it is said that society needs to accept sex you choose to have, even without being his own, but everything has to depend on what you decide, then someone could say it is an animal and not a person and then according to this reasoning other citizens should accept it. It would be more logical, from my point of view, help those who are not comfortable with their gender to change their minds, because the reasons are hormonal problems or childhood traumas that can be solved. It will always be more reasonable to use the medicine to help someone who is comfortable with her own sex that away from him. In this false era of false democracies politicians promise whatever just to get the vote as a means for public money. Homosexuality is a depraved conduct and the fact that the law should permit it does not make it morally right. Because not confuse respect for what everyone does in their private life, in fact collaborate with it.

Another prejudice is feminism, as is proposed today, because in some of its aspects induce women to be evil; he says that man owes them something for the sake of being a man. Feminists propose be equal in everything, but not in regard to life expectancy, as men often live less, they do not want equality in terms of participation in wars or hard work physically, but certainly not They hesitate to demand the same salary claiming to be just as productive, do not ask for equality in the division of property upon separation, as in many countries are the main beneficiaries.

The concept of prejudice, good or bad in many cases is conditioned by the opinions of the great powers, it is not all a lie, but half-truths are used to induce erroneous conclusions, as with racism. Does the reader should wonder what would have happened to win the German World War II? Because the focus given in the media about the extermination of the Jews by the Nazis, is the one that would have been used to treat the extermination of the Indians in the United States, but as they won the Americans accept seamlessly arguments used to justify this killing, basically citizens tend to believe too much in the arguments that the great powers tell them, mainly for fear unfortunately society pays more attention to appearances than reality.

After the economic crisis of 1929 Germany was sunk economically in order to gain power the Nazis created panic accusing the Jews of being to blame for all evils and proposing themselves as saviors, then society will he believed, thought that if the government said it had to be true, Americans also used slander as a way of justifying the Indian extermination, so we can seize their lands, and likewise citizens accepted it. This strategy defamation prior to justify aggression step was also used later with the Arab world, in order to control its oil reserves, especially by countries so-called "democratic," when a government tries to do something knowing which provoked public rejection simply choose to distort reality and thus get public support. In history there are other similar examples, such as when Spain claimed to be Christianized America when it actually did was occupy, or when England went to war against the Boers in South Africa claiming worry about the natives, when in fact they wanted the control mines recently discovered diamonds.

Today, we are witnessing a (UN) hypocritical submitted to the United States, which denies threatening nuclear weapons to those who refuse to bow to his intentions, but instead gives them to countries like Israel, which uses a policy of extermination with the Palestinian people, to replace its inhabitants for their own settlers. US greed is the real cause of the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, for example giving Arab countries is harmful when trying to impose by force allied governments where he pleases.

We live in a promiscuous society without values bring it resulted in a social dissatisfaction resulting in an inordinate desire to obtain money, in the mistaken belief that solve their discomfort. Parents tell their children not to do what they do, what form of an example is that? They call sex love, to distort its true meaning, there can be love in sex, but it's not the same. It encourages women to live an uncontrolled sexuality, arguing that they can always abort, it is absurd to have sex without being willing to accept the consequences this may bring, and it is fair that governments respect the free will of women, but they should also refuse to finance such acts.

Currently live before some religious organizations obsessed only by not losing their privileges and power, as in the case of the Catholic Church, that by denying its members the right to marry I just turned into a ghetto gay, dedicated more to profit and rape of minors than they should. Citizens are realizing that to search for the great universal truths do not need intermediaries to tell them what is true and what is not, because society you need are religions and non-religious organizations, whose real purpose is to compete with governments by the power. Philosophy is through schools and books as they should learn.

I do not pretend that all actions made by governments or associations always pursue false interests, not to deny that in the world there are many positive things, but it is true that only through a detailed analysis of the facts discovered impostors in rather than submit to mere compliance that often these organizations ask us.

This is a world that needs a change, but a shift towards the realization of a life based on moral, but not the morality proposed by religious organizations, given to greed and lust for power, but a morality based on justice and the truth.

For the man of the future will understand that happiness is through peaceful means such as science and technology as must be obtained not through vanity or tyranny, and only when you understand this, you are really in a position to start a new was.




Many people from time immemorial have wondered what is the right way to choose in philosophy, from my point of view the right path is that of a dignified life and justice, he who arises to live according to these principles lies the solution to your ideological questions, because life straight in pursuit of justice dispels the darkness that confuse the mind. It is not possible to have a developed society if not deeply moral, and cannot be moral when there is no justice as the essential principle of behavior. For whoever has these principles as the core of its conduct has easier the solution to your problems because justice is light and light is culture and truth, and society of the future will be deeply moral because only in this way can be happy and find peace. A society who’s only expectation materialism and the sole purpose of obtaining money is an unhappy society because it serves to have money if you have no soul.




The main reason for writing this book is to provide the reader the keys from my point of view are necessary for humanity to reach its full realization, I also try to encourage him to do a thorough analysis of the world around him, so that be able to depart from the glamor and false version of reality that economic and powers the great powers struggle to try to have, at every time governments have tried that their truth is the only accepted at present interest systems so-called "democratic" to control information is even greater, in order to condition the vote and that citizens support what they are told. I do not pretend here that evil is present only in governments, as these are only the reflection of the society they represent. It is therefore necessary to analyze in detail what the de facto powers tell us, but also make an examination of conscience ourselves. Progress is the road that runs from darkness to light and certain ideas often are mixed with the wrong, so it is necessary to analyze things impartially, without being carried away by pre-established topics and ideas. A better world is possible, but you need to get away from evil and despotism. Man, through its evolution has managed to develop a complex language in order to communicate, it has also achieved by ships technology which go into space, we just need you to create a code founded values of truth and justice, to It is fully realized.



Nov. 12, 2018, 7:26 p.m. 0 Report Embed 0
The End

Meet the author

Antonio Pinto Renedo Mi mayor ilusión es descubrir aquello que los libros no cuentan.

Comment something

No comments yet. Be the first to say something!